๐๐๐๐ฅToxic Deadly EVS
If you have a Tesla story please add it in comments and I hope to add it on this post. Thank you
First a word from our sponsors
Inspired fine art spanning about six years. Art of nature, structures, buildings, people, places, with a modicum of spice. Enjoy to the fullest art made from the heart.
๐ด๐ด๐ด๐๐ด๐ด๐ด๐๐ด๐ด๐ดFebruary 1, 2025
EVS fall under the antigravity domain in space flight, submersibles, space flight and aircrafts
VITAL UPDATES ON NWO, FIRES (FLOODS AND WEATHER) AND PAST TO PRESIDENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA
๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด๐ด
It looks like Tesla is blaming the victims in crashes! The dead can’t speak!
Tesla facing federal probe days after fatal Autopilot crash in Monroe
Federal auto regulators announced Friday they are opening an investigation into the safety of Tesla’s Autopilot feature, less than a week after a Tesla driver believed to be using it allegedly struck and killed a motorcyclist in Monroe.
Jeffrey Nissen, 28, of Stanwood was on his way home from work on Highway 522 when the Tesla Model S struck his blue 2003 Yamaha R6, Nissen’s fiancรฉe Janae Hutchinson said Thursday.
Washington State Patrol spokesperson Chris Loftis said the agency is still investigating whether the Tesla driver was using Autopilot — a combination of cruise control and Autosteer intended to maintain the car’s set speed while keeping a safe distance from other vehicles and in its driving lane. The crash was among a rising number of collisions in Washington involving cars equipped with the technology, mostly Teslas.
Washington saw 17 such crashes last year compared to 12 in 2022, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data. Of the 35 crashes in Washington involving Autopilot-equipped cars reported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration between Sept. 1, 2021 and March 15, 2024, all but three were Teslas, according to the data.
Federal auto safety regulators on Thursday opened another investigation into Tesla’s recall of its Autopilot system last year, saying the company may not have done enough to keep drivers who use the technology focused on the road. The timing of the investigation and the fatal crash that killed Nissen are not necessarily linked.
The recall of over 2 million Teslas in the U.S. followed a two-year investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration into a series of crashes that happened while Autopilot was activated. Tesla released a software update in December for cars equipped with the system, adding more controls and alerts that would “encourage the driver to adhere to their continuous driving responsibility” while using Autosteer, a component of Autopilot.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Office of Defects Investigation said Tesla’s Autopilot system may still be inadequate. The agency identified at least 13 fatal crashes and 32 crashes resulting in injuries where Tesla drivers misused the system, according to a report released Thursday by the agency.
Representatives for Tesla did not respond to interview requests.
Elon Musk, the company’s chief executive officer, said in 2021 that Teslas on Autopilot were “approaching 10 times lower chance of accident than average” vehicles, citing federal and Tesla’s crash rates data.
According to Tesla’s website, Autopilot enhances safety while reducing a driver’s “overall workload,” and is “intended for use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.”
But some drivers using Tesla’s Autopilot overestimate the system’s capabilities and pay less attention to driving, sometimes resulting in avoidable — and occasionally fatal — crashes, according to the report.
Hutchinson, the motorcyclist’s fiancรฉe, argues Autopilot is marketed as making roads safer but actually makes drivers who use it less attentive and more dangerous, a sentiment echoed by some experts.
“It made me so angry that someone could feel so comfortable with their vehicle taking care of them and moving them through traffic that they would even be looking at their phone long enough for something like this to happen,” she said. “No matter what, you keep your eyes on the road.”
Ryan Calo, a University of Washington law professor who focuses on the intersection of law and robotics and artificial intelligence, said the system rests on an unrealistic assumption that drivers will stay focused on driving while using it.
“By calling it ‘Autopilot,’ and knowing what we all know, including Tesla, about human psychology, you should expect that people are going to do what this motorist did, which is cease to pay adequate attention to the road,” Calo said.
Drivers who aren’t keeping their eyes on the road may fail to notice safety risks that their car’s Autopilot technology also misses, Calo said. He pointed to a 2016 Florida crash where a Tesla’s Autopilot system failed to distinguish the side of a white tractor-trailer from the bright sky and didn’t activate the car’s brakes. The 40-year-old driver died after crashing into the truck.
Every crash resulting from a driver misusing Tesla’s Autopilot increases the company’s liability, said Steve Tapia, a law professor at Seattle University whose focuses include artificial intelligence.
“They’re putting these products out there and it’s becoming increasingly clear that there’s a problem,” Tapia said. “You can’t put something out into the world knowing full well that people are going to misuse it and then try to absolve yourself from responsibility.”
State law in Washington has been slow to keep up with rapid advances in technology like Autopilot and full self-driving capabilities, Tapia said.
Autonomous driving, or the operation of vehicles with no human involvement, is currently only legal for testing in Washington, and only three companies — NVIDIA Corporation, Waymo and Zoox — have certified with the state’s licensing department to do so, said Loftis, the Washington State Patrol spokesperson.
All drivers, regardless of whether they are using Autopilot, are required under Washington law to maintain control of their vehicle, Loftis said in an emailed response to questions.
“We all understand that just because a given car can attain high speeds, we do not then have the right to drive at excessive or unsafe speeds,” Loftis said. “Our laws govern our behavior even if a specific vehicle’s capacity offers options outside the law, safety, and courtesy.”
Link to recent feeds https://kidsworldplus.blogspot.com/2025/01/all-books-and-journals-by-laurel-sobol_29.html?m=1
๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️๐ ฑ️
https://kidsworldplus.blogspot.com/2025/01/california-fires-updates.html?m=1
https://kidsworldplus.blogspot.com/2025/01/vital-updates-no-on-nwo-fires-floods.html?m=1
Officials probing fiery Tesla crash that killed 4 people in France
According to preliminary reports, the vehicle rammed into several road signs at high speed as it left the road, and the local Western Courier newspaper said it only came to rest many yards from where it initially veered off.
The newspaper, citing police, said the driver was a 65-year-old man from Niort and the three passengers were employees of a restaurant he frequented, aged 26, 21 and 16, whom he'd offered a ride in his car after work.
Tesla did not immediately reply to an AP request for comment and the auto company owned by billionaire tech magnate Elon Musk posted no statement on his social media platform X, previously called Twitter.
Tesla has frequently faced scrutiny over safety issues. In April, the carmaker settled with the family of an engineer killed when a Tesla Model X crashed in Silicon Valley in 2018, a move that avoided a trial.
The driver was on a California highway using the Tesla autopilot feature when the car drove into a concrete median, according to the lawsuit.
Earlier this month Tesla issued a recallfor 27,185 of its Cybertruck vehicles because of visibility problems with their rearview cameras — the fifth recall for the stainless steel electric pickup truck since it hit the road at the end of 2023.
In December, Tesla recalled more than two million vehicles in the United States and Canada because of risks associated with the autopilot software and a potentially "increased risk of a collision", according to US national regulators.
♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️♒️
Parked Teslas Keep Catching on Fire Randomly, And There’s No Recall In Sight
Except
Why are Teslas catching fire? It’s a question we’ve asked Tesla repeatedly only to be met with the same answer: We’re looking into it, and by the way, gas cars catch fire too. Then, silence.
There are over 270 million cars on the road in the United States, and the vast majority of them run on gasoline. It’s flammable, sure, but the fact that an equivalent majority of vehicle fires involve gas-powered cars is also a function of their monopoly. So it’s worth taking a step back and looking at how in recent months, with over half a million Teslas on the road at this point, the number of spontaneous fires involving the Model 3, S, and X seems to be increasing.
Tesla says there’s no reason for concern, but it still pushed a “precautionary” over-the-air update to its Model X and Model S fleet to improve thermal management in the wake of one fire earlier this year. Then another stationary Model S caught fire. And a recall doesn’t appear to be coming either, even as Audi makes a cautious and potentially sale-killing move to recall its new E-Tron SUV over a potential fire issue just months after its release.
As the frequency and details often get lost in the days, weeks, and months between incidents, The Drive has put together a timeline of each occurrence, as well as location, model, and whether or not it was charging at the time of combustion in an effort to better see the bigger picture.
✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️ https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/tesla-car-battery-fire-needed-6000-gallons-water-to-extinguish-rcna68153
NBC News
Car crash claims lives of 2 Missouri men after Tesla overturns, catches fire
Now picture this in space where fire is deadlier than at sea! Because that’s where Tesla already is dreaming of life on not the jewel earth, but lifeless Mars!
Why Tesla EVs Catch Fire and Why Victims Struggle to Escape
We have often seen news articles or news broadcasts about how the drivers or passengers of Tesla EVs were stuck in the burning vehicles and could not escape and suffered a lot before they passed out. Why this happens over and over again?
Tesla electric vehicles (EVs), like many other EVs, use lithium-ion battery packs, which pose unique challenges when they catch fire, making them difficult to extinguish and complicating rescue efforts. The nature of these fires, known as “thermal runaway,” occurs when a single battery cell overheats and causes a chain reaction with other cells. This reaction generates extremely high temperatures, reaching up to 900°C (1,650°F), and releases flammable gases, making these fires intense and difficult to control.
Let’s see why Tesla Fires Are Hard to Extinguish
Once a Tesla’s battery pack ignites, it requires a massive amount of water to cool down and extinguish the flames. Firefighters often need tens of thousands of gallons of water, and even then, the fire may reignite due to residual heat and the battery’s chemical reactions. Conventional firefighting methods are not always effective, which sometimes forces emergency responders to monitor the vehicle for hours or even days to prevent re-ignition.
Why Rescuing Victims Is Challenging
In an accident involving a Tesla fire, victims inside the vehicle may find it difficult to escape. Tesla’s doors rely on electric mechanisms, which may become inoperative if the battery is compromised or if there’s a power failure. In such cases, manual release mechanisms are the only option, but they are not always intuitive or easy to locate under pressure or in an emergency scenario.
From the outside, rescuers face additional hurdles. High-voltage systems in Tesla vehicles pose a risk of electric shock, and damaged battery packs can release toxic gases like carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Without the proper training and equipment, first responders may struggle to access the vehicle safely, especially if they are unsure whether the power systems are still active.
What’s Being Done
Fire departments and emergency response teams are retraining and equipping their personnel specifically to handle EV fires. However, the industry and regulatory bodies still face challenges in creating universally effective protocols. Tesla and other manufacturers are gradually improving safety features and providing more detailed rescue guidelines to assist first responders.
The combination of battery design, intense heat, and reliance on electronic systems makes Tesla fires particularly difficult to manage, both for those inside the vehicle and for rescuers trying to intervene.
Tesla’s Countermeasures for EV Fires
Tesla has implemented several countermeasures to address the challenges associated with EV fires, particularly those involving their lithium-ion batteries. The company has developed comprehensive emergency response guides tailored for first responders, providing detailed instructions on managing fires and extracting occupants by safely de-energizing vehicles. These guides help ensure that emergency teams can operate safely around high-voltage systems.
Additionally, Tesla has incorporated manual release mechanisms in its vehicles, allowing occupants to exit even if electronic systems fail. However, these mechanisms can be difficult to locate or operate under stress, prompting Tesla to educate owners and first responders about these features.
Tesla also focuses on ongoing improvements in their software and safety systems. The vehicles include features that monitor battery health and notify drivers of potential issues before they escalate, proactively managing battery risks to reduce the likelihood of fires.
Furthermore, Tesla collaborates with organizations such as fire departments and safety agencies to update protocols and provide training specifically for EV-related incidents. This ongoing collaboration is part of their strategy to enhance safety standards and ensure that Tesla drivers and first responders are better prepared for potential emergencies.
Tesla Vehicles’ Manual Release Mechanisms: Not Intuitive
Tesla vehicles are equipped with manual release mechanisms for emergencies, but their functionality and accessibility vary significantly across different models. In most Tesla models, including the Model S, Model 3, and Model Y, manual door release levers are located near the door handles or within the door panels. For the front doors, these levers are generally easy to access; for instance, the Model 3 and Model Y feature mechanical release levers on the front doors, allowing occupants to manually unlock the doors if the electronic systems fail.
However, the rear doors present more challenges. In some Model Y vehicles, for example, the manual release mechanism requires users to remove a floor mat and access a hidden release tab, a procedure that may not be intuitive or practical during high-pressure situations like a fire. Such a design complicates escape for rear passengers who might be unfamiliar with the mechanism’s location, especially when time is critical.
Despite efforts by Tesla to educate owners through manuals and emergency response guides, the placement and design of these manual releases remain points of concern. Occupants who are unfamiliar with their vehicle’s safety features may struggle to locate or operate these mechanisms during emergencies. Critics argue that while Tesla has included these safety measures, their complexity and inconsistent placement across models could hinder effective escape in a crisis.
For instance, the Model 3 only has manual release mechanisms for the front doors, making it impossible for rear-seat passengers to exit manually if power fails. In the Model X, the rear door manual release requires users to remove a speaker grille, making it even less accessible during emergencies. These limitations have led to reports of individuals being trapped in Tesla vehicles during power failures or accidents.
Critics suggest that Tesla should redesign these features to enhance accessibility or provide clearer, more visible guidance for owners and passengers. Although Tesla emphasizes that these manual releases are meant only for situations when electronic systems fail, many believe that the current setup may still not meet optimal safety standards. While the company has made efforts to inform users through manuals, the onus often falls on owners to familiarize themselves with these features to prevent potentially dangerous situations.
The manual release mechanisms in Tesla’s Model Y, as shown in the images, reveal potential safety issues during emergencies, especially when the vehicle catches fire. While Tesla has designed these features as a safety measure, their complexity and location raise concerns about their usability in high-stress scenarios.
The front door release lever is straightforward, located near the window switches, making it accessible. However, its effectiveness relies on the occupant’s prior knowledge of its location. In an emergency, such as a fire where visibility is compromised, or if the driver is in a state of panic, quickly finding and using this lever might still be a challenge.
The rear door release requires several steps: removing a floor mat, pressing a tab to access a hidden compartment, and then pulling a mechanical cable. This multi-step process is far from intuitive and may be impractical for rear passengers, especially children, or anyone unfamiliar with the vehicle’s design. In the chaos of a fire or accident, locating and executing these steps under pressure is unlikely for most, potentially leading to delayed evacuation or entrapment.
To enhance safety and ensure quick evacuation during emergencies, Tesla could consider implementing the following solutions.
- Centralized and Illuminated Emergency Release Buttons: Rather than hidden mechanisms, Tesla could introduce centralized emergency release buttons that are clearly marked and illuminated for visibility, even in smoky or low-light conditions. This would allow occupants to find and use them more quickly during a crisis.
- Automatic Door Release System During Emergencies: Another approach could be integrating an automatic door release feature that activates when the vehicle detects critical situations such as fire or severe collisions. This system would disengage locks and open doors automatically, reducing the need for occupants to locate and manually operate release mechanisms under stress.
- Simplification and Standardization: Simplifying the rear door release mechanism to mirror the straightforward front door release, and ensuring that these are standardized across all models, would eliminate confusion and ensure all occupants have a consistent, easy-to-use escape route.
- Frequent User Training and Prompts: Tesla could also implement periodic in-vehicle safety prompts or tutorials that guide owners through emergency procedures, reinforcing awareness and ensuring that occupants remain familiar with the locations and operation of manual release features.
By making these adjustments, Tesla can significantly improve occupant safety and ensure their vehicles offer reliable, intuitive emergency exit options that work effectively under any circumstances.
Is Tesla Using Cheap, Unsafe Batteries? Not Quite
Chinese-made batteries have often been scrutinized for their quality and safety, especially when compared to those manufactured by established companies like LG Energy Solution and Panasonic. While Chinese manufacturers such as CATL and BYD have expanded rapidly to dominate the global market, their growth has not been without issues. Some incidents of EV fires have been linked to batteries from these companies, often due to manufacturing defects or insufficient quality control. Although Chinese battery producers are improving their safety standards, they still trail behind their South Korean and Japanese counterparts, which have consistently emphasized high-quality and reliable battery production.
Companies like LG Energy Solution, Panasonic, and Samsung SDI are well-regarded for their focus on safety, reliability, and innovation. These manufacturers invest heavily in research and development to reduce the risk of thermal runaway, a common cause of EV fires. Their consistent quality standards provide them with an advantage, particularly in markets where safety and compliance are prioritized. Panasonic, for example, supplies high-performance cylindrical lithium-ion batteries to Tesla, focusing on durability and performance to meet premium market demands.
On the other hand, some Chinese manufacturers historically prioritized cost reduction, which sometimes led to compromises in quality control and safety measures, increasing the risk of defective batteries entering the market. While Chinese brands are now working to elevate their standards and align with international safety norms, the perception remains that batteries from established Japanese and South Korean companies are generally safer and less prone to fires.
It is entirely safe and responsible to claim that EVs should prioritize using high-quality, safe batteries rather than opting for cheaper, lower-quality alternatives. The choice of battery has a significant impact on safety, reliability, and the overall performance of electric vehicles. Poorly manufactured batteries or those with inadequate quality control are more prone to thermal runaway and fires, posing severe safety risks to occupants and emergency responders.
Tesla primarily uses batteries supplied by well-established and reputable companies such as Panasonic, LG Energy Solution, and CATL.
Tesla has a long-standing partnership with Panasonic, which produces cylindrical lithium-ion batteries specifically designed for Tesla’s models, such as the Model S, Model 3, and Model X. These batteries are known for their high energy density and reliability, making them a preferred choice for Tesla’s high-performance vehicles.
For models like the Model 3 and Model Y, especially those produced in Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory, LG Energy Solution supplies high-quality batteries. LG’s batteries are known for their advanced technology and stringent safety standards, aligning with Tesla’s commitment to reliability.
In China, Tesla also collaborates with CATL to supply lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries for some Model 3 and Model Y variants. LFP batteries are safer and less prone to overheating compared to traditional lithium-ion batteries, although they typically have a lower energy density. CATL’s LFP batteries offer Tesla a safer and more economical option for its standard-range vehicles.
Tesla’s use of batteries from these reputable suppliers demonstrates its commitment to safety and performance. However, for all EV manufacturers, ensuring consistent quality control and prioritizing safety over cost is critical for maintaining a reliable and secure electric vehicle market.
Despite Tesla Using High-Quality Batteries, Why Do Fire and Explosion Incidents Still Occur?
Despite Tesla using high-quality batteries from reputable manufacturers like Panasonic, LG Energy Solution, and CATL, incidents of fires and explosions still occur. There are several reasons for this, which include not just the quality of the batteries but also the nature of lithium-ion technology, the design of EVs, and external factors.
Thermal runaway remains a concern. Even high-quality lithium-ion batteries are susceptible to this phenomenon, where an overheated cell can cause neighboring cells to ignite in a chain reaction. This is a known risk associated with lithium-ion chemistry, and while manufacturers like Tesla implement cooling systems and protective measures, the risk cannot be entirely eliminated.
External damage is another critical factor. EVs, including Teslas, are vulnerable to fires if their battery packs are punctured or damaged in accidents. Even minor damage to the battery cells can cause internal short circuits, leading to fires. Tesla has attempted to address this issue with reinforced battery packs, but severe impacts or high-speed crashes can still compromise these protections.
Overcharging and charging malfunctions also pose risks. Although Tesla employs sophisticated battery management systems (BMS) to regulate charging and prevent overcharging, errors can occur. If a BMS fails or a surge happens during charging — particularly with third-party chargers — it can lead to overheating and fires.
Software and firmware play a crucial role in EV safety. Unlike internal combustion engine vehicles, EVs rely heavily on software to manage battery health. While Tesla’s software systems provide advantages, glitches or bugs can result in incorrect temperature readings or failures to terminate charging when necessary, increasing the risk of fire.
In August 2024, a fire involving a Mercedes-Benz electric vehicle occurred in an apartment complex in Incheon, South Korea, prompting the evacuation of around 200 residents. Following the incident, Mercedes-Benz and BMW disclosed their battery suppliers due to mounting safety concerns. The battery involved was identified as coming from Farasis Energy, a Chinese manufacturer. In response, South Korean authorities urged all EV manufacturers to disclose battery details and offer free inspections to address the growing fears and ensure consumer safety.
Despite these factors, it’s worth noting that Tesla and other manufacturers have been working to reduce these risks through constant software updates, more robust cooling systems, and safer battery chemistries (e.g., lithium iron phosphate or LFP, which Tesla uses in some models). However, the inherent risks associated with current lithium-ion battery technology mean that EV fires and explosions remain a possibility, even with the best safety measures in place.
⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️
Sen. Richard Blumenthal demanding answers about possible $400 million State Department purchase of Tesla Cybertrucks
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, the ranking member on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio Thursday night demanding answers and documents relating to the State Department's possible purchase of $400 million worth of armored Tesla Cybertrucks from the company run by Elon Musk.
"Mr. Musk's dual roles pose conflicts of interest so obvious that they hardly require explanation," the Connecticut Democrat wrote in the letter obtained by CBS News. "The State Department's intent to purchase armored Cybertrucks suggests the conflicts of interest inherent in Mr. Musk's installation of his cronies throughout the government are not being adequately managed and, in fact, are increasing by the minute.
"In the 15 months since it was released, the Cybertruck has been widely derided and subject to at least six separate recalls. Indeed, Tesla has reportedly had "disastrous" sales numbers for the Cybertruck. It hardly seems like the type of reliable vehicle the State Department would choose for this contract absent a heavy thumb on the scale."
Blumenthal asked for a response by Feb 21.
Last week, he opened a preliminary inquiry into Musk and his companies.
Musk, the world's wealthiest person, who is also CEO of SpaceX and X(formerly Twitter), has enormous government contracts and was a huge contributor to Mr. Trump's campaign.
He heads the newly-created Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, which, while not an official government agency, is aggressively pursuing ways to cut the federal budget.
Musk's team has gone into computer systems in numerous agencies looking for what he calls waste, fraud and abuse. Numerous lawsuits have been filed challenging his authority to do that.
In October, GM Defense completed its first Suburban Shield — a heavy-duty armored version of the suburban for the State Department's Diplomatic Security Service (DSS). The program is intended to provide armored SUVs to DSS and more than a dozen other federal agencies, according to GM Defense. GM won the 10-year, up to $300 million dollar contract in November 2023.
END POWER FUEL GAME WILL BE NUCLEAR POWERED ELECTRICITY AND ELECTRIC CARS DESTRUCTIVE TOXIC ENDURING FILTHY ENERGY— OCTOBER 28, 2021 - ARSENIO TOLEDOHYPOCRITES: CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE WILL USE COAL-POWERED CHARGING STATIONS AND DIESEL GENERATORS TO CHARGE ELECTRIC VEHICLES
https://kidsworldplus.blogspot.com/2021/10/end-power-fuel-game-will-be-nuclear.html?m=1
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
EV ENERGY COMES FROM NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND COAL—WHAT COULD BE WORSE THAN TOXIC NUCLEAR ENERGY? HOW DOES THE BRAZILIAN SPACE CIRCLE ⭕️ TAKE PART? A PLASTIC SHIELD THE SIZE OF BRAZIL BLOCKING THE SUN FRO EARTH OR INTENSIFYING THE SUN???
https://kidsworldplus.blogspot.com/2023/04/ev-energy-comes-from-nuclear-power.html?m=1
๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐ธ๐ธ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ธ
NWO: THINGS THAT WILL REVOLVE AROUND EACH OTHER AND CAN BE COUNTERED BY OPPOSITE ENFORCEMENTS THAT ARE GOOD
1. This category: Purchase of humans and their movements worldwide through closed door deals and political weaponization to disrupt and take down YHWU and his people (illegal immigration)
2. This category: Strategic eradication of swaths of land, people, animals, nature -manufacturing of disasters especially fire and weather no holds barred (antigravity, drone, laser, observatories and satellites)
3. This category: Holding onto NWO power hold by destroying all American values and cores and one nation under YHWH (God of Yeshua, who is Jesus)
4. This is a category: Opposition to NWO and a choice to celebrate YHWH
Tesla needs hydrogen vehicles with water emissions!
Her parents were injured in a Tesla crash. She ended up having to pay Tesla damages
BEIJING (AP) — Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes don’t work! Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into an SUV and a sedan and crashing into a large concrete barrier.
Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the car’s brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than $23,000 in damages and publicly apologize to the $1.1 trillion company.
Zhang is not the only one to find herself in the crosshairs of Tesla, which is led by Elon Musk, among the richest men in the world and a self-described “ free speech absolutist.” Over the last four years, Tesla has sued at least six car owners in China who had sudden vehicle malfunctions, quality complaints or accidents they claimed were caused by mechanical failures.
The company has also sued at least six bloggers and two Chinese media outlets that wrote critically about the company, according to a review of public court documents and Chinese media reports by The Associated Press. Tesla won all 11 cases for which AP could determine the verdicts. Two judgments, including Zhang’s, are on appeal. One case was settled out of court.
It is not common practice for automakers — in China or elsewhere — to sue their customers. But Tesla has pioneered an aggressive legal strategy and leveraged the patronage of powerful leaders in China’s ruling Communist Party to silence critics, reap financial rewards and limit its accountability.
The AP review of Tesla’s record in China comes as Musk is wielding significant influence in President Donald Trump’s new administration, leading an effort to rapidly shrink the size of the federal government and oust employees deemed disloyal to the president. His actions have raised concerns that Musk is weakening the U.S. system of checks and balances, in part, to benefit Tesla and his other companies.
In the United States, Musk has found a powerful ally in Trump. Together, they have launched an assault on the federal government, freezing spending, suspending programs and dismissing prosecutors, government watchdogs and others that have traditionally acted as guardrails.
Tesla officials in China and the United States did not reply to requests for comment.
Tesla’s record in China shows how Musk has thrived in a system in which regulators, the media and the courts — which must all ultimately answer to the ruling Communist Party — are, by design, somewhat intertwined.
Tesla has profited from the largesse of the Chinese state, winning unprecedented regulatory benefits, below-market rate loans and large tax breaks. With a few pointed exceptions, Tesla has enjoyed ingratiating coverage in the Chinese press, and journalists told AP they have been instructed to avoid negative coverage of the automaker.
Tesla’s windfall has extended to the courts — and not just in legal actions Tesla has brought against customers. In a review of public court documents, AP found that Tesla won nearly 90% of civil cases over safety, quality or contract disputes brought by customers.
February 14 2025
3. This category: Holding onto NWO power hold by destroying all American values and cores and one nation under YHWH (God of Yeshua, who is Jesus)
Police are the most hurt aside from family and friends of victims that they attend to after accidents and incidents.
In all fairness the Tesla wrecks and catches fire and doesn’t burn out for at least one day and tankers full of water doesn’t put it out. Tesla fires are a whole level worse than standard vehicle fires after accidents. Nobody knows this as well as fire rescue and police because they are usually the ones trying to save lives after wrecks. It’s no secret that teenager death due to Tesla uncontrollable lithium battery fires that erupt on impact— regardless of the Tesla looks like a tank, it’s a bigger tomb. Tesla wants lithium battery space vehicles that are already proven disasters! Hiding the lithium battery and nuclear power that drive EVS Tesla isn’t going to go well for Musk. He needs to revamp his ideologue of what is important. Homes are burning down with people in them and family pets. EV bikes, scooters and appliances are the culprit behind horrible fires that are extremely difficult to put out. The LA Fires of January 2025 are an example of Tesla debauchery adding fuel to the fires and making the fires super hard to put out without tons of water.
Authorities said that fire crews tried to douse the fireball with extinguishers, but the intensity of the flames was too hot.
Toxic cocktail of cocaine and booze led to teens fiery death in Tesla crash in California
Cocaine and alcohol are revealed as a deadly contributor to the tragic Tesla Cybertruck crash that burst into flames and killed three teenagers in California.
The crash last November tragically killed Soren Dixon, 19, Jack Neslon, 20, and Krysta Tsukahara, 19, who graduated from Piedmont High School in 2023.
Autopsy and toxicology results revealed that Dixon, who had been driving the vehicle, had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.195 percent - more than twice the legal limit for drivers (.08 percent).
The autopsy revealed Tsukahara's blood alcohol content was at 0.028 percent and Nelson's at 0.168 percent. All three victims were also revealed to have had cocaine in their systems.
The vehicle crashed around 3.08 am on November 27, 2024, in Piedmont in Alameda County.
During a preliminary investigation, Piedmont Police Chief Jeremy Bowers said the Cybertruck veered off the road, hit a retaining wall and crashed into a tree before bursting into flames.
Their deaths, ruled an accident, were caused by asphyxia due to inhalation of smoke from the car fire, according to an autopsy report obtained by the SF Chronicle.
The Alameda County Coroner’s Office said that burns were a “significant” condition contributing to each of their deaths, the outlet reported.
One passenger, 20-year-old Jordan Miller, was pulled alive from the SUV but seriously burned. The three others were pronounced dead at the scene.
Miller was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit in a medically induced coma.
Miller's mother, Samantha Miller, told DailyMail.com in December that he had been in 'critical' condition following several surgeries.
She further told CBS News: 'We're just taking it day by day. As you would expect, it's a devastating situation and, you know, we're all thinking about the kids that were lost.'
'They're not kids anymore, but they still are to us,' she added.
Police chief Jeremy Bowers said another car had been trailing the Tesla and pulled the survivor out of the wreckage.
'The solo vehicle that was involved in the crash, there was another vehicle that came after it, that was following behind and came upon the vehicle as it was fully engulfed,' Bowers said.
'The individual exited the car and was able to pull the person out, but the nature of the vehicle was a Cybertruck and the heat was just too intense.'
Bowers said it is possible the victims and the man who tried to rescue them all knew each other and had been together before the crash.
The front of the Cybertruck was completely destroyed. The electric vehicle's battery is not believed to have caught fired following the collision.
Authorities said that fire crews tried to douse the fireball with extinguishers, but the intensity of the flames was too hot.
All four of those involved in the crash were sophomore students at universities across the country and had been friends since high school.
Bronson Boyle, who was Dixon's roommate at USC, shared a photo of them standing in their dorm room calling him 'the best roommate and friend I ever could've asked for'.
'Our first night as roommates we snuck onto the new north roof, and just talked for hours, getting to know one another,' he wrote.
'That first day encounter, and every day of the 8 months that followed as roommates, were filled with unpredictable fun. Always upbeat, ever inviting, and ferociously fun - that’s who you were. I’m so glad to have known you.
'I’ll always remember you as brother-one who was righteous beyond belief. Rest in peace man. I’ll miss ya every day. I’ll raise a glass to you every day forever.'
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
NEW UPDATE EV’S—AFTER ANOTHER ROUND OF TWO YOUTHS KILLED BY EV BATTERY HOUSE FIRE EV ELECTRIC VEHICLES DEADLY FIRE STARTERS HAVE TAKEN OUT MANY PEOPLE, PETS, HOMES AND BUSINESSES AND EV AUTOPILOT VEHICLES DEADLIER THAN CLAIMS! THE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NEEDED TO SUPPLY A COUNTRY AND WORLD IS ASTRONOMICAL‼️
January 31, 2025
3. This category: Holding onto NWO power hold by destroying all American values and cores and one nation under YHWH (God of Yeshua, who is Jesus)
January 31, 2025
3. This category: Holding onto NWO power hold by destroying all American values and cores and one nation under YHWH (God of Yeshua, who is Jesus)
January 31, 2025
2. This category: Strategic eradication of swaths of land, people, animals, nature -manufacturing of disasters especially fire and weather no holds barred (antigravity, drone, laser, observatories and satellites)
3. This category: Holding onto NWO power hold by destroying all American values and cores and one nation under YHWH (God of Yeshua, who is Jesus)
3. This category: Holding onto NWO power hold by destroying all American values and cores and one nation under YHWH (God of Yeshua, who is Jesus)
Police say burning Tesla battery prevented them from saving driver in fatal crash
Torrance police responded to a single-vehicle collision involving a Tesla at the intersection of Madrona Avenue and Plaza Del Amo Tuesday at about 10:15 p.m., according to a department news release.
A 2025 Tesla Model Y was southbound on Madrona Avenue when, for unknown reasons, the electric car swerved to the right, collided with a traffic pole and caught fire with the driver trapped inside, authorities said.
