Skip to main content

Updates Ongoing ‼️ Ongoing New World Order Influencer UK Traitor To The British Natives As Home Office lawyers argued that “migrants’ rights to be housed in the hotels were more important than the rights of local residents‼️”

Updates Ongoing ‼️  Ongoing New World Order Influencer UK Traitor To The British Natives As Home Office lawyers argued that “migrants’ rights to be housed in the hotels were more important than the rights of local residents‼️”

https://kidsworldplus.blogspot.com/2025/08/uk-traitor-to-british-natives-as-home.html?m=1

Keep reading for gads of information ‼️



π’œ 𝒫𝓁𝒢𝒸𝑒 πΉπ‘œπ“‡ π»π‘œπ“…π‘’ 𝒢𝓃𝒹 π’Ÿπ“‡π‘’π’Άπ“‚π“ˆ ~ All books by Laurel Sobol available Online at Barns and Noble Books https://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/laurel%20sobol ♥️Oregon Author ♥️Mom Homeschooler ♥️American Business Woman ♥️American Artist & Poet ♥️The Magical Fairytales ♥️OLT Organic Lifestyle Today ♥️Nez PerceπŸ“š ♥️Mysteries Of Topanga Canyon ♥️Little House Of Miracles Barnes and Noble have all Laurel Sobol books available!




❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌ The remuneration of paying criminals for their crimes was duly noted during the Obama-Biden Administration and government policies of ancient practices to pay for crimes done to others especially to Pay For Crimes done to people who protest violence of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and elsewhere ‼️  

πŸ”΄πŸ”΄πŸ”΄



However Obama regime paid billions of dollars to the Muslims and gave them numerous 

F-16’s, training and weapons.


Obama unblocks delivery of F-16s to Egypt

 Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox






The White House said Obama told Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi by phone on Tuesday that a 2013 freeze would be lifted.
The move comes as Egypt plays a key role in the Arab offensive against Iranian-backed Huthi rebels in Yemen and engages in the fight against the Islamic State group in Libya.
The decision would help "create a US-Egyptian military assistance relationship that is better positioned to address the security challenges of the 21st century," said National Security Council spokesperson Bernadette Meehan.
Aside from the high-tech war planes, Obama also agreed to deliver 20 Harpoon missiles and up to 125 M1A1 Abrams tank kits.
The shipments had been blocked after Sisi's military allies forcibly ousted elected president Mohamed Morsi in July 2013.
The new Egyptian authorities insist they acted to maintain order amid mass protests against a government that had lost popular support.


Critics branded the move a coup.
Hundreds of supporters of Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood have been killed and thousands imprisoned in a government crackdown.
Rights groups accuse Sisi of installing a regime more repressive than the one of former longtime strongman Hosni Mubarak.
Mubarak was toppled in early 2011 after an 18-day uprising, leading to years of unrest.
Islamists revile Sisi, but he is popular among Egyptians who say the country needs a firm hand.
Washington annually offers about US$1.5 billion (S$2 billion) in aid to Egypt, including US$1.3 billion in military aid.
Around US$650 million in military aid was frozen after Morsi's overthrow.

πŸ”΄

U.S. gift of F-16 fighters headed to Egypt, despite Morsi's harsh rhetoric


By Maxim Lott Fox News
Updated 



Four F-16 fighter jets left the U.S. this morning, bound for Egypt as part of a foreign aid package critics say should have been scrapped when the nation elected a president who has called President Obama a liar and urged that hatred of Jews be instilled in children.

A source who works on the naval air base in Fort Worth, Texas, confirmed the departure of the state-of-the-art fighter planes to FoxNews.com. Sixteen F-16s and 200 Abrams tanks are to be given to the Egyptian government before the end of the year under a foreign aid deal signed in 2010 with then-Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a longtime U.S. ally.

Critics, including several in Congress, say it doesn't make sense to follow through with the package, given that new Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, elected last summer, has given decidedly mixed signals about relations with the U.S. While he has toned down his rhetoric since his election, in 2010 - the same year the aid package was struck - Morsi attacked Obama for supporting Israel.

“One American president after another — and most recently, that Obama — talks about American guarantees for the safety of the Zionists in Palestine," Morsi, then a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, said on Egyptian television in reaction to Obama's 2009 speech in Cairo. "[Obama] was very clear when he uttered his empty words on the land of Egypt. He uttered many lies, of which he couldn’t have fulfilled a single word, even if he were sincere — which he is not.”

In the comments translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute, Morsi went on to urge that children be taught to hate Jews.

More On This...

    Dear brothers, we must 

    not 

    forget to nurse our 

    children 

    and grandchildren on 

    hatred towards those 

    Zionists and Jews, and all 

    those who support 

    them," 

    he said. "They must be 

    nursed on hatred. The 

    hatred must continue.”

    Lawmakers told FoxNews.com that even if Morsi has softened his stance, it makes no sense to arm his Islamist government with weapons that could one day be used against Israel or even Egyptians.

    “It is appalling that the Obama administration would send F-16s and 200 military tanks to Egypt in the wake of the instability, [and the] anti-American and anti-Israel atmosphere," Rep. Louie Gohmert, (R-Texas), told FoxNews.com.

    The U.S. government ordered the planes for Egypt from Lockheed Martin in 2010, as part of an annual aid package that regularly topped $1 billion. But the very next year, a popular revolution began which ultimately resulted in Mubarak's ouster and imprisonment, and the election of Morsi, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. In November, Morsi tried to claim dictatorial powers, but was forced to back down from his claim after massive protests against the move.

    Many worry that arming such a volatile Egypt will endanger Israel.

    "My hope and prayer is that someone in this administration will wake up and smell the burning of [Israel's] future and rescind the supply of planes and tanks," Gohmert said. "If they do not, then perhaps there will arise leaders within our Congress with newfound courage to stop the lunacy."

    [pullquote]

    Rep. Vern Buchanan, (R-Fla.), who recently called for ending foreign aid to Egypt altogether, told FoxNews.com the Muslim Brotherhood-backed Morsi government has been sending increasingly troubling signals to Washington, and giving it state-of-the-art fighter jets is a dangerous idea.

    “American tax dollars must not be used to aid and abet any dictatorial regime that stands with terrorists,” Buchanan said.

    Others note that Egypt's leaders could use the weapons on their own people.

    "Tens of billions in U.S. aid has enhanced Cairo’s capacity for internal repression," Malou Innocent, a foreign policy analyst at the Cato Institute, told FoxNews.com.

    "U.S. aid accounts for as much as 80% of the Egyptian Defense Ministry’s weapons procurement costs... In essence, American taxpayers have been Egypt’s major arms supplier, subsidizing the supply of F-16 jet fighters, M1A1 Abrams battle tanks, armored personnel carriers, Apache helicopters, and hundreds of millions of dollars in surplus military equipment."

    The State Department did not respond to a request for comment about the pending delivery. But earlier this month, a spokesperson said the Obama administration seeks to “maintain a strategic partnership with Egypt that enhances the security and peace of the region.”

    But Anthony H. Cordesman, who has served as a consultant for the State and Defense departments and who holds the Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the administration is right to send the planes.

    "If you were to suddenly end this partnership with Egypt -- if you were to make Egypt feel that somehow it were not trusted or second-best, what would the security implications be? It certainly would justify or encourage all of the extremist elements that are trying to push Egypt away from both the peace process and the security partnership with the U.S.," he told FoxNews.com.

    He said that the cost of providing the weapons is worth it.

    "We need to remember that Egypt isn't just important to Israel. It is critical to us, because it controls the Suez Canal. It has been a vital staging point for U.S. operations in the gulf."

    Cordesman argued that the F-16 fighter jets are unlikely to be turned against us or our allies, as they are too complex to be used effectively without U.S. maintenance.

    "These weapons systems are certainly extremely effective, but no one can sustain them unless that partnership with the United States continues," he said. "The modern software, the computer systems, the munitions that make this weapons system so lethal -- other than us, there are no alternative suppliers. There are European states who can provide parts of the aircraft, but F-16s and most modern systems are basically dependent on U.S. manufacturers."

    "In some ways, the more sophisticated the system, the safer it is to transfer," Cordesman said, while noting that there are still risks.

    "There's no such thing as an arms transfer that is totally risk-free," he said.

    According to a U.S. Air Force description, the planes' "maneuverability and combat radius exceed that of all potential threat fighter aircraft."

    "The F-16 can fly more than 500 miles, deliver its weapons with superior accuracy, defend itself against enemy aircraft, and return to its starting point," the description states. "An all-weather capability allows it to accurately deliver ordnance during non-visual bombing conditions."


    πŸ”΄πŸ”΄



      Muslims reportedly received $35 to rape a woman.  

    $35 in 2008 when Obama government was allotting this sum for this crime is equivalent to almost $100 in 2025 prices.

    This payment of Muslims to kill and violate women in heinous rape and beatings was and is encouraged to prevent more women from standing up to unwanted and unwarranted violence used against the people!  

    How much did the Muslims and New World Order pay to this criminal for his beating, rape and homocide of a girl?



    ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌


    Middle Eastern Alien Jailed For 4 Years In Germany For Rape Of Two Teenagers

    🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️


    18-Year-Old Is Raped In Italy By North African Alien



    An 18-year-old woman in Italy was beaten and raped after being dragged into woodland near San Zenone al Lambro train station, prompting Lombardy regional officials to call for railway underpasses to be closed during evening hours.

    The assault took place shortly after midnight on Sunday. According to investigators, the teenager was at the station underpass on Via del Bissone when a man, described as North African, approached her. He then suddenly forced her into some bushes bordering the station, where he beat and raped her before fleeing.

    The victim managed to call emergency services. She was taken first to Policlinico Hospital and then to Milan’s Mangiagalli Clinic, a specialist center for sexual violence cases.

    Il Giornale reported how police are analyzing surveillance footage from the station and surrounding areas, while the Lodi prosecutor’s office has opened a case and is coordinating with police investigators. DNA samples have also been collected to help identify the attacker.

    Romano La Russa, Lombardy’s regional security councillor from Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy (FdI), has called for the closure of underpasses at train stations during the night to prevent further attacks. “RFI [the owner of Italy’s railway network] must, together with the municipalities, initiate a census of the most dangerous railway underpasses and plan their closure. The incident in San Zenone al Lambro is extremely serious; immediate action is needed.”

    Franco Lucente, regional councillor for transport, expressed solidarity with the victim alongside La Russa: “Our deepest sympathies go to the young woman, the victim of such heinous violence. Law enforcement is working to identify the perpetrators of this unspeakable crime, and we hope they will soon be brought to justice.”

    Lucente added that Lombardy has long invested in safety on public transport and highlighted Trenord’s new fleet of trains equipped with cameras, as well as expanded video surveillance in stations. “The goal is to ensure that there are no ‘no man’s lands’ where crimes go unpunished. This requires collaboration with local governments and police forces to ensure comprehensive surveillance of sensitive areas.”

    This, however, has not stopped a surge in attacks in recent times.

    In July, an American tourist was stabbed in the chest while traveling on a regional train from Melegnano to Milan, in the latest of over 260 violent incidents reported on Italy’s rail network so far this year.

    The 27-year-old victim was attacked near San Giuliano Milanese train station by a group of three or four young men described as of North African origin, who reportedly attempted to steal his gold necklace before fleeing the scene.

    In July, a 20-year-old woman was raped by a man of North African origin while commuting alone by train from Trecate to Novara, just west of Milan.

    “I was alone; there was no one on board except me,” the woman told the police. “When my attacker approached me, I looked around. I immediately understood his intentions, but I didn’t have time to escape. I tried to call for help, but no one heard me and was able to intervene. I was alone. I was scared.”

    In November last year, trade unions threatened to strike over the escalating violence facing their workers on Italian public transport. The move followed the stabbing of a train conductor by two young men of North African origin on a regional train in Genoa Rivarolo.

    “The gravity and intolerability of these episodes urgently require firm and decisive intervention,” the unions said in a joint statement.




    ⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️⭕️

    Guaranteed there was an active live camera in the area recording everything Especially cameras on the moving freight train!

    Liana K., was walking home from her dental assistant apprenticeship when she dialed her grandfather (who heard his grandchild as she  was murdered)


    Police say DNA evidence links a 31-year-old Iraqi migrant, Muhammad A And 

    A breath test showed he was intoxicated at the time. He was not arrested until Aug. 29, more than two weeks later, when the incident was finally reported in the national media.


    — but according to the city they had zero cameras in the area.  Germany is such a high technology spy state can see the crime from before it occurred, as it occurred, and afterwards…Germany officials can view the homocide from space and much closer from every angle imaginable because they are seeking to destroy their native citizens and destroy them so there’s room in Germany for illegal immigrants and especially Moors who are the invading Muslims.  All the properties and homes of Europeans are sought after by endless hoards of lawless immigrants especially Islam Muslims.

    The Muslim killer of a child in Germany wasn’t arrested for quite some time after he murdered her!  A beautiful child who loved her family and life and was learning a trade to help others in the medical world!

    This article claims mental health illness of Muslim illegal immigrant who allegedly violently shoved a child into a moving freight train ‼️  The fact is Muslim Islam is a worldwide horrifying indoctrination from before birth that the religious leaders and teachers incite hatred and violence towards non-Muslims and particularly as their Koran dictates Muslims to live by destroying, eliminating removing Hebrews and Christians from the face of the earth— furthermore Islam Muslim religion dictates genocide…including killing their own Muslim religious members as Shiites and Sunny Muslims are two distinct classes who clash in genocide especially in the Middle East especially in Africa and Pakistan and Asia and now the rest of the world wherever they are.

    Islam Muslim Moors abide by their Un-holy ghastly diseased Koran manual to the letter— the Koran dictates Muslims destroy and remove everyone especially Christians, Hebrews, from the world!

       Genoside especially by Muslims against others is often precluded by the use of numbing narcotics and drugs to dull the senses of the troops who are Muslims as they ready themselves to slaughter and use genocide against whole villages, cities, and countries of undesirable populations that the Muslims kill.  Yes Muslims are a severe mental health catastrophe terrorist group inciting genocide worldwide that’s why the New World Order loves and unites with this Muslim Army!

    Iraqi Alien Arrested After Killing Ukrainian Teen Girl In Germany



    A 16-year-old girl who fled Ukraine for Germany was speaking on the phone to her grandfather when she was fatally pushed in front of a freight train in Friedland earlier this month, according to reports.

    Police say DNA evidence links a 31-year-old Iraqi migrant, Muhammad A., whose asylum application had already been rejected, to the attack.

    As reported by Bild, the victim, identified as Liana K., was walking home from her dental assistant apprenticeship when she dialed her grandfather. According to Geisleden Mayor Markus Janitzki, who has supported the family since they fled Mariupol in 2022, “Her grandfather had to listen to everything. He heard screams, then just the sound of a train.”

    Investigators believe the suspect shoved her from the platform with full forceGoettinger Tageblatt reported that DNA traces belonging to the suspect were found on her right shoulder, consistent with a forceful push. It also noted that while there was no CCTV footage at Friedland station, prosecutors confirmed the girl was on the phone when she was struck, and her grandfather heard the incident.

    The 31-year-old man was initially questioned at the scene, where police had been called because of reports of a disturbance. Officers described him as “neither agitated nor threatening” and released him after he claimed to have found the victim’s body.

    A breath test showed he was intoxicated at the time. He was not arrested until Aug. 29, more than two weeks later, when the incident was finally reported in the national media.

    Liana’s family had rebuilt their lives in the German state of Thuringia after escaping the Russian invasion. Both parents found jobs, and Liana had graduated school, started her training, and cared for her younger brothers, aged 5 and 11. “She was loving, ambitious, hardworking, and learned German quickly. She was a role model for her brothers,” Mayor Janitzki said.

    The suspect’s asylum claim had been rejected in December 2022 under the Dublin Regulation, with Lithuania deemed responsible for his case. A twisted irony is that, given his country of arrival into Europe, he likely entered via Russia or Belarus.

    His appeal was dismissed in February 2025, but deportation procedures stalled. Authorities had even sought detention in July 2025, but the Hanover District Court rejected the application, calling it flawed.

    Lower Saxony Interior Minister Daniela Behrens expressed her frustration, saying, “It is incomprehensible to citizens that people can stay in Germany for years even though a completely different EU country is responsible for them.”

    The accused has a history of mental illness and was diagnosed with schizophrenia. He is currently being held in a secure psychiatric facility while prosecutors examine whether he is criminally responsible.

    Meanwhile, a fundraising campaign has been launched in Liana’s home community of Geisleden to support her parents and brothers with funeral costs. She is expected to be buried in mid-September.



    πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘πŸ›‘

    News

    “Treason against Its Own People”: Musk Takes Flamethrower to UK Government after Court Decision



    Billionaire Elon Musk took a flamethrower to the UK government, accusing it of committing “treason against its own people,” after it won an appeal against a decision preventing the housing of migrants in hotels 

    Home Office lawyers argued that migrants’ rights to be housed in the hotels were more important than the rights of local residents ——-Billionaire Elon Musk took a flamethrower to the UK government, accusing it of committing “treason against its own people,” after it won an appeal against a decision preventing the housing of migrants in hotels.

    At the Court of Appeal on Friday, Lord Justice Bean, Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb ruled in favour of the government and Somani Hotels Ltd., which runs the Bell Hotel in Epping, where protests against the government’s policy of housing migrants in hotels began.

    Epping Council leaders had won a temporary injunction to close the hotel, but the Court of Appeal overturned it.

    Home Office lawyers argued that migrants’ rights to be housed in the hotels were more important than the rights of local residents.

    A huge social-media backlash followed the announcement of the decision, and Twitter owner Musk, who has voiced sharp criticisms of the UK government in the past, went on a tear of his own, taking the UK government to task and accusing it of betraying the British people.

    In one Tweet he wrote, “A nation with a government against its people shall perish from the earth!”

    In another, he said, “The government is committing treason against the people.”

    “The nightmare happening to Epping and hundreds of other towns in Britain and Ireland will come to your town too, unless it is stopped by the people,” he warned.









    ⭐️ He retweeted and commented on posts by activist Tommy Robinson, Member of Parliament Rupert Lowe and a number of patriotic British accounts.

    He also drew users’ attention again to the scale of the grooming-gang scandal, labelling it “unconscionable.” ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️


    ⭐️⭐️

    In response to the ongoing protests, the UK government has created a new taskforce to monitor anti-migration sentiment online, as official fears grow of another summer of unrest like last year’s.

    According to Britain’s Daily Telegraph, the UK Home Office has formed a group called National Internet Intelligence Investigations to “maximise social media intelligence” about anti-migration sentiment in the UK.

    The group will work from the National Police Coordination Centre, which was used to monitor and enforce the social restrictions during the pandemic.

    The government has vowed to come down hard on protesters if there is a repeat of last year’s unrest, which began with the murder of three schoolgirls in Southport by Axel Rudakubana, the son of a Rwandan migrant.

    “While the public have a right to protest against the current situation, we will never tolerate unlawful or violent behaviour,” a government spokesman told The Independent.

    “Working closely with the police, we have thorough and well-tested contingency plans in place to deal with any public disorder, which have been strengthened since last year’s shameful scenes.”

    Footage of the current protests has been blockedon X for British users after the country’s controversial new “Online Safety Act” came into effect recently.  The Act, passed by the previous Conservative government, was intended to prevent children from being exposed to pornography and graphic content on the internet, but it already appears to be being used for a very different purpose.

    Before the introduction of the Online Safety Act, X stated that it would use various methods, including “email-based estimation” to assess whether a user is likely to be an adult or not.

    The Online Safety Act mandates fines of £18 million or up to 10% of a company’s turnover if a company violates the Act.




    ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Secret $8 billion deal between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood

    No wonder Obama is asking the Egyptian Army to release MorsiObama has asked for the release mohamed-morsi • SECRET agreement between the


    http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?71070-Secret-8-billion-deal-between-Obama-and-the-Muslim-Brotherhood


    Secret $8 billion deal between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood

    SHOCKER: Secret $8 billion deal between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood
    Below is a summary of the video in Arabic that reveals an agreement made between Barack Obama and Mohamed Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood, to give 40% of Sinai to Hamas in exchange for $8 billion has already been paid to Morsi by Obama. 

    No wonder Obama is asking the Egyptian Army to release Morsi: Obama has asked for the release mohamed-morsi




    • SECRET agreement between the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood (not the Egyptian government) to give 40% of the Sinai and the annexation of that part of Egyptian territory in Gaza. The objective is to facilitate the conclusion of a comprehensive peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians 

    • This agreement was signed by Khairat el Shater (number 2 of the Brotherhood) by Morsi and the Supreme Guide of the Mulsim Brotherhood.

    • A sum of U.S. $ 8 billion was paid in exchange for the land. 

    • An investigation is ongoing Morsi and El Shater. An arrest warrant was filed against the Guide to MB and other members of his office. 

    • MB signatories to the agreement are liable to the death penalty for treason. 

    • The Obama administration would try to reach an agreement with El Sissi (Defense Minister): recognition of the legitimacy of the “coup” in exchange for his silence about the secret agreement. But El Sissi would be more interested in the conviction of MB and discredit their organization which is Egypt’s main source of danger. 

    • The Republican members of Congress are seriously looking into the case. If proven, the process of Obama impeachment could be triggered.





    1. In 2011, Obama signed a law that made aid to Egyptcontingent on the State Department's assurance that Egyptwas making progress on human rights. When Morsi won the presidency, there was no ...
      Listen to the article now

      Listen to the article now
      Audio by Carbonatix
      Starting a year ago this week, Obama seemed to choose the worst over the bad in Egypt.

      Caught between military dictatorship and Muslim Brotherhood rule, Egyptians face a choice between bad and worse. Through its rhetoric and aid policy, Obama administration has consistently favored the worst of the bad lot.

      Today, Thursday, July 3, marks the one-year anniversary of Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Mohamed Morsi’s ouster from the presidency by the Egyptian military in the wake of massive protests. Morsi’s successor, former defense minister Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, was sworn in as president this past June 8.

      While Sisi is undeniably authoritarian, he has not openly allied himself with jihadi terrorists as Morsi has. In his inaugural address, Morsi announced his intention to agitate for the release of Omar Abdel-Rahman from U.S. custody. Rahman, known in the U.S. as the “blind sheikh,” is implicated in the 1981 assassination of Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat, the 1993 World Trade Center bombings, and numerous other terrorist plots.

      Responsible foreign policy requires the ability to distinguish between bad outcomes, and a willingness to accept something less than desirable when necessary. In Egypt, the Obama administration has treated military rule as the worst, and perhaps the only, catastrophe that could befall Egypt. Whether intentionally or not, this line of thinking has led to policies that favor Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood.  

      Consider the way Secretary of State Hillary Clinton provided Morsi with verbal support in the critical days leading up to the June 24, 2012, presidential election. In a discussion hosted at the State Department three days before the election, Clinton said it was “imperative that the military fulfill its promise to the Egyptian people to turn power over to the legitimate winner.” She also warned about the danger of “backtracking,” to a military regime.

      In a different context, those remarks would be entirely reasonable. The rub is that Morsi’s competitor, Ahmed Shafiq, was a military man denounced by critics as a throwback to the Mubarak regime. Clinton’s uttering of these words in the eleventh hour of the campaign — without any warning about the dangers of Islamist government — could only have undermined him.

      The Obama administration’s use of foreign aid — arguably America’s biggest political lever — has also tended to favor the Muslim Brotherhood. Thanks to the Camp David accords, Egypt receives $1.5 billion of aid annually, most of which is earmarked for the military. That makes Egypt the second biggest recipient of U.S. aid next to Israel. Both countries have come to rely on the aid.

      In 2011, Obama signed a law that made aid to Egypt contingent on the State Department’s assurance that Egypt was making progress on human rights. When Morsi won the presidency, there was no indication that this was the case. Many in Congress, including Democratic stalwart Patrick Leahy, expectedto see the aid suspended until such progress was seen. The law, however, allowed for the secretary of state to sign a waiver for national security reasons. And that is what Clinton did.

      Critics were especially galled that the Obama administration was prepared to provide the Muslim Brotherhood-controlled government with 20 F-16 fighter jets and 200 tanks based on an aid package that had been agreed upon when Mubarak, a long-time American ally, was in power. Twelve of these planes were delivered before Morsi’s ouster.

      Upon the news of Morsi’s overthrow, a White House press release urged the army “to move quickly and responsibly to return full authority back to a democratically elected civilian government as soon as possible” and “to avoid arbitrary arrests of Mr. Morsi and his supporters.” To his credit, Obama refrained from demanding Morsi’s re-installment or calling the ouster a “coup,” which, by law, would require immediately terminating aid at a critical moment.   

      Yet the flow of aid did slow, starting with the transfer of the fighter planes. A Washington Post article quotes Pentagon press secretary George Little as saying: “Given the current situation in Egypt, we do not believe it is appropriate to move forward at this time with the delivery of F-16s.”

      The White House said this decision did not have implications for the $1.5 billion in foreign aid that Egypt had come to expect. Then, following Sisi’s brutal crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood — and while the United States was distracted by the 2013 government shutdown — the Obama administration suspended most of that aid as well.

      The stall has continued into this year amid human rights abuses by the government, but a substantial chunk, $572 million, was released during Secretary of State John Kerry’s June 22 visit to Cairo. It appears that the remainder is being used as a carrot to encourage the government to treat the Muslim Brotherhood as a legitimate political actor, rather than an Islamist enemy of the country. At the time of the visit, an aide to Kerry said:

      We do not share the view of the Egyptian government about links between the Muslim Brothers and terrorist groups like ISIS [the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq]., [Egyptian leaders] need to include, and find ways to reach out to, the Muslim Brothers.# …# With regard to the challenge that the Muslim Brothers pose, I would characterize it more as a political challenge than a security challenge.

      This may be how the Obama administration sees the Muslim Brotherhood, but it is not how Sisi sees the Muslim Brotherhood, and it is not how the Muslim Brothers see themselves. The Obama administration must learn that there isn’t always a “third way.” Sometimes decisions are between bad and worse. Ignoring reality only makes the worst more likely.

      — Spencer Case is an intern at National Review.


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    2. "Obama gave the Muslim Brotherhood a million [then correcting himself] a billion and a half dollars last week, you know, in Egypt. We need that money here.


      C. Eugene Emery Jr.
      By C. Eugene Emery Jr.April 27, 2012

      U.S. Senate candidate Barry Hinckley says Obama administration gave $1.5 billion to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood

      Foreign policy was one of the issues that came up when U.S. Senate candidate Benjamin "Barry" Hinckley was interviewed on "State of the State," a cable television public affairs program that aired April 21 and 22.

      Hinckley, a Republican, was critical of foreign aid, and specifically questioned one of the aid decisions of the Obama administration. He was struggling a bit as he made his point, but here's what he said:

      "Obama gave the Muslim Brotherhood a million [then correcting himself] a billion and a half dollars last week, you know, in Egypt. We need that money here. A billion and a half dollars could really help Rhode Island, quite frankly. We probably need it, in my opinion, more than the Muslim Brotherhood needs it . . . especially when the Muslim Brotherhood got together, I think one of the first things they did, when they convened their new congress, was to make Israel enemy #1. And we give them a billion and a half dollars? That's a problem in my book. We need to focus our resources here."

      The Muslim Brotherhood has been a part of Egyptian politics -- sometimes an outlawed part -- since 1928; one of its goals is to promote Sharia law, which is the moral code and religious law of Islam.

      Did the Obama administration really give the Brotherhood $1.5 billion?

      It turns out that the money was actually an aid package to Egypt itself, not the Brotherhood, according to a March 22 story in The Washington Post.

      We contacted Hinckley's campaign.

      Spokesman Christopher McAuliffe said Hinckley "is aware that there is a pro forma difference between the Muslim Brotherhood and the government of Egypt. In that light, his position could certainly have been more precise. However, I do think the basis of it is readily understandable, since the Egyptian government is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood."

      For guidance on that point, we contacted some experts on Egypt.

      Melani Cammett, director of the Middle East studies program at Brown University, told us that sending aid to Egypt was not the same as giving it to the Brotherhood because the Brotherhood doesn't actually control the government.

      "It's true that the Muslim Brotherhood won the plurality of seats [in December elections] and when you combine them with the Salafis, which are more radical Islamists, they've won the majority of seats in the parliament," she said. "The fact of the matter is the SCAF, which is the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, still controls the government and controls the executive branch and is manipulating things in such a way that it's making it difficult for the Islamists to exert their full power as the majority in parliament."

      "So the major struggle going on in Egyptian politics right now is that the SCAF, controlled by elite military officers, is not willing to relinquish power," said Cammett.

      John P. Entelis, director of Middle East studies at Fordham University, said it would be "totally inaccurate" to say that $1.5 billion is going to the Muslim Brotherhood. "This is an ongoing military aid package that we've been giving to Egypt since 1979."

      The aid package, according to multiple sources, includes $1.3 billion in military aid and $250 million in economic and political assistance.

      Our ruling

      Republican U.S. Senate candidate Barry Hinckley said the Obama administration approved $1.5 billion to go to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood.

      In fact, the aid package was for the nation of Egypt, not the Brotherhood. The Brotherhood may control the largest bloc of seats in parliament, but it's not even a majority. Not only that, the country itself continues, for now at least, to be controlled by the military. And more than 80 percent of the aid package is military aid.

      The statement is incorrect for so many reasons, we rate it False.

      (Get updates from PolitiFactRI on Twitter. To comment or offer your ruling, visit us on ourPolitiFact Rhode Island Facebook page.)

      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

      The New Republic
    3. In a certain sense, the Obamaadministration's decision to withhold much of the $1.3 billion in annual aid given to Egypt isn't surprising. U.S. law mandates cutting off aid to ...
      Obama Just Made a Terrible Mistake on Egypt
      Eric Trager


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    4. Jul 1, 2013President Barack Obama insisted Monday that he isn't taking sides in the standoff between Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and millions of protesters who've taken to the streets to protest his ...

      The president faces questions about whether he invested too much in a flawed leader.

      By  JOSH GERSTEIN07/01/2013 08:27 PM EDTUpdated: 

      https://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/barack-obama-egypt-morsi-093638

      President Barack Obama insisted Monday that he isn’t taking sides in the standoff between Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and millions of protesters who’ve taken to the streets to protest his policies. 

      But that’s not likely to be enough for many in those angry crowds, who seem firmly convinced that the White House has bolstered the Muslim Brotherhood leader, even as ordinary Egyptians — and some in his own Cabinet — have grown increasingly dissatisfied with his rule. 

      As the Egyptian military issued what appeared to be an ultimatum Monday for Morsi and the opposition to sort out their differences within 48 hours, Obama found himself in a painfully familiar place — facing questions about whether the United States has, once again, invested too much in a helpful but flawed Middle Eastern leader while paying insufficient attention to burgeoning popular discontent. 

      PHOTOS: Scenes from Egypt

      It’s the same set of questions that dogged Obama throughout the Arab Spring, when he wrestled with the dilemma of precisely when to ditch a string of besieged leaders, from Libya’s Muammar Qadhafi to Egypt’s previous president, Hosni Mubarak. 

      “Our commitment to Egypt has never been around any particular individual or party,” Obama said Monday in Tanzania, the final leg of his week-long Africa trip. “Our commitment has been to a process.” 

      The president acknowledged that the United States had worked with Morsi. But, he suggested, that shouldn’t be mistaken for enthusiasm about his rule. 

      “The U.S. government’s attitude has been we would deal with a democratically elected government,” said Obama. “Democracy is not just about elections — it’s also about how are you working with an opposition?” 

      Also on POLITICO: Obama on Egypt: Commitment to a process, not individual

      Obama’s comments about Morsi seemed decidedly less effusive than the praise the Egyptian president won from the White House last November, when an official statement credited him for his “personal leadership” in helping to broker a halt to fighting between Israel and the Hamas-led government in the Gaza Strip. 

      Just a day after Obama publicly thanked Morsi and “reaffirmed the close partnership between the United States and Egypt,” the Egyptian leader triggered another round of widespread protests by announcing a decree that granted himself virtually unlimited power. 

      Now, some analysts believe the administration may have had too much faith in Morsi as a “practical” leader who could satisfy Islamist elements in Egypt while managing both the opposition and the economy. 

      PHOTOS: Elections in Egypt

      Obama administration officials “were more inclined to give [Morsi] and his movement the great benefit of the doubt and also to see that there was no practical alternative to keep Egypt at least stable,” said David Pollock of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 

      “This was not a good bet. … We embraced the Brotherhood as a legitimate and practical partnership, but now, it turns out not only did they veer off the Democratic track quite badly almost a year ago, [but] also they’re not capable of maintaining Egypt’s basic stability and state interests.” 

      Republican lawmakers also faulted the administration’s stance as tilting too far in favor of Morsi. 

      “The Egyptian turmoil stems from the Morsi government’s predictable power grab, which the Obama administration has been far too accepting of,” House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) said in a statement. “U.S. aid has failed to compel the Morsi government to undertake the political and economic reforms needed to avert this crisis.” 

      Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) echoed the criticism. “We should have been leveraging our assistance to Morsi to push his government to implement real democratic reforms — the ones these demonstrators have been desperately crying out for — from Day One instead of providing aid unconditionally and legitimizing Morsi’s government,” she said. 

      The Obama administration actually had little choice other than to embrace the government elected last June, in the view of many experts — but as signs of trouble emerged, American officials reacted too slowly and meekly. 

      “The U.S., I think, was appropriately saying it accepted the outcome of the free and fair elections” that brought Morsi to power, said Tamara Wittes, director of the Brookings Institution’s Saban Center for Middle East Policy. 

      “It’s also fair to say that the U.S., since the election of Mohamed Morsi, has gone out of its way — perhaps even too much — to demonstrate support for that elected leadership even in the face of decisions it made that called into doubt its commitment to those constitutional principles,” she added. 

      U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson has become a particular lightning rod for demonstrators after saying in a recent speech that the United States was “deeply skeptical” that protests would improve the situation in Egypt and suggesting that the government’s opponents needed to show greater patience. 

      As protests swelled Sunday, some demonstrators waved signs with a red X imposed on a distorted photo of Patterson. Street graffiti and at least one banner urged her to leave the country. 

      Obama has come in for his share of direct criticism from the crowds, as well. Above Cairo’s Tahrir Square, a large sign declared in broken English that the U.S. president supports “dictator Morsi,” according to a photo snapped Friday by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

      The notion that the U.S. might be Morsi’s best hope doesn’t seem limited to the Egyptian leader’s opponents. Britain’s Guardian newspaper quoted an unnamed Morsi aide Monday saying that a drive toward a “military coup” was underway but “won’t be able to move forward without American approval.” 

      State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell used measured language Monday to respond to the political crisis in Egypt but sharply condemned protesters who directed their ire at Patterson. 

      “You’ve seen some of these photos of the ambassador, and we really find it abhorrent and reprehensible that people are sort of personalizing this,” Ventrell told reporters at a daily briefing. “The ambassador has very much stated U.S. policy. She’s one of our finest ambassadors, and we really find it reprehensible that people have personalized it and a lack of understanding on the part of some that we really don’t take sides.” 

      Despite Ventrell’s claim that Patterson was simply restating U.S. policy, it was notable that neither Obama nor Secretary of State John Kerry repeated her assertion that “street action” is likely to be unproductive. 

      “Demonstrations are a very legitimate form of expression for citizens in any country. And it’s imperative, we hope, that those demonstrations will be peaceful, that the government would respect them and that the people will respect their fellow citizens,” Kerry said last week. “It’s up to the citizens of Egypt to make decisions as to whether or not they feel that all of those kinds of reforms and initiatives are taking place in a way that meets their needs.” 

      One analyst based in the region, Shadi Hamid of the Brookings center in Qatar, said Patterson’s remarks were ill-timed and “condescending.” However, he said her basic point — that political organizing is a better route for the government’s opponents — is on the money. 

      Hamid and others also said they worry that if the elected Morsi regime is ousted, democracy will be set back across the region as Islamists argue that the United States won’t respect electoral victories by the movement’s leaders. 

      “Street protests aimed to topple a democratically elected leader are problematic from a stability standpoint especially,” Hamid said. “The U.S. shouldn’t be in the business of supporting military coups.” 

      As the largest protests broke out over the weekend, Kerry was in the region on his fifth trip as secretary of state, attempting to broker peace between the Israelis and Palestinians. He did not travel to Egypt on the latest swing but said in Tel Aviv on Sunday that he was “very much alert to and concerned about and in touch on the subject of Egypt.” 

      Kerry said he had spoken with Egyptian opposition figures, like former Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa and former International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Mohammed El-Baradei. However, by midday Monday, Ventrell said he had no word that Kerry had spoken with his Egyptian counterpart, Foreign Minister Mohamed Amr. 

      Early Tuesday morning Cairo time, Egypt’s state news agency, MENA, reported that Amr had tendered his resignation. Five other Cabinet members reportedly attempted to resign Monday, as well. 

      There are some parallels between Obama’s embrace of Morsi and the administration’s approach to other Middle Eastern leaders. The White House has invested a huge amount of time and resources in building its relationship with Turkish President Recep Erdogan only to see him face unrest and protests at home — though not on the scale of the Egyptian discontent. 

      Early in his first term, Obama pursued an Israeli-Palestinian peace strategy that involved the U.S. working hand-in-hand with Mubarak and chose to travel to Cairo to deliver a speech aimed at resetting America’s relationship with the Arab and Muslim world. Mubarak clearly viewed the choice of venue as a vote of confidence in his leadership and an implicit rebuff to long-standing complaints about human rights violations and lack of democracy. 

      By early 2011, the peace process was moribund, and Mubarak faced unprecedented popular protests against his nearly three decades of autocratic rule. After 11 days of protest, Obama gave up on the veteran Middle Eastern leader, whose exit set in motion the process that resulted in the election of Morsi last year. 

      Now, just a year later, the United States again finds itself linked to another Egyptian leader facing the same kinds of street demonstrations and public dissatisfaction that drove his predecessor from power — and Obama once again confronts the question of how long he can offer his support to a man who appears to be losing the support of his own people. 

      https://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/barack-obama-egypt-morsi-093638

      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

    5. The Morsi Conspiracy: Egypt's Morsi acts like a dictator, so why does President Obama send him billions in support in the name of democracy?
      https://moneymorning.com/2013/07/05/morsi-conspiracy-obamas-strange-support-of-the-ousted-egyptian-tyrant/


      Morsi Conspiracy: Obama's Strange Support of the Ousted Egyptian Tyrant




      After days of heated demonstrations washed over the streets of Egypt, the Egyptian military removed Muslim Brotherhood-backed President Mohamed Morsi on Wednesday.

      Since Morsi's election in June, 2012, the Obama administration has been strangely supportive of Islamist leader, forking over $1.3 billion in military funding to Egypt annually. It's the Morsi conspiracy.

      I say "strangely supportive," because conspicuous red flags dot Morsi's political career. 

      A few years prior to his presidency, Morsi delivered a speech urging Egyptians to "nurse our children and our grandchildren on hatred" of Jewish people. A few months later, he described Zionists as "descendants of apes and pigs" in a television interview.

      The US is, of course, the closest ally of Israel.

      But ostensibly, the Obama administration has been throwing so much monetary and PR support Morsi's way in order to show our backing of a democratically elected government in Egypt.

      Morsi was democratically elected in a tight presidential race last year, and maintains that he is the country's legitimate leader.

      But Egypt's highest-ranking military officer, General Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi, said that Morsi "did not achieve the goals of the people" as he became increasingly authoritarian and non-democratic.

      Although Morsi hasn't been in power long, he already has quite the history of "removing" his opposition.

      Morsi forcibly retired the chairman of the Supreme Council of Armed Forces, who had been Egypt's de facto ruler in between Mubarak's fall and Morsi's election.

      In November 2012, Morsi issued an edict declaring his decisions to be immune from judicial review until the holding of a constitutional referendum.

      An elected parliament was dissolved by court order, and then Morsi converted the Shura Council, a ceremonial upper house that only 7% of Egyptians voted for, into a legislature. 

      Naturally, a legislature which does whatever Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood asks of it.

      In December 2012, the rushed completion of a constitution by Morsi and his aides led to mass protests and at least 5 deaths.

      Obama responded by placing a phone call with Morsi to express his "deep concern" and stressed how violence against the opposition is unacceptable.

      In March, US Secretary of State John Kerry pledged to release $250 million in American aid to Morsi to support Egypt's "future as a democracy."


      (AP) US Secretary of State John Kerry and Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in March.

      In May, the Obama administration issued a waiver on military funding to Egypt, sidestepping Congress' instruction to condition delivery of the $1.3 billion on progress with human rights and democracy.

      In fact, John Kerry signed the waiver so quietly it was not even announced. Human rights groups have been justifiably vocal about how such waivers hurt the progression of democracy in Egypt.

      Choosing to sidestep Congress directly flies in the face of the Obama administration's claims that our U.S. billions are going to Egypt to further human rights and democracy.

      Then in June, 43 Egyptian and foreign non-governmental organization (NGO) employees were given jail sentences ranging from 1 to 5 years, as a result of a case against foreign-funded pro-democracy groups.


      That's right: a case *against* foreign-funded pro-democracy groups. And 16 of the 43 employees were Americans. 

      Suspiciously, the ruling came at a time when the Egyptian parliament was considering a bill proposed by Morsi that would profoundly restrict NGO activities in the country.

      International outrage deepened over these events. Three Republican senators - John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Kelly Ayotte, warned:

      "It is increasingly impossible to argue that the Egyptian government is safeguarding and advancing the democratic values that inspired the Egyptian revolution of 2011."

      Later in June, Anne Patterson, the US Ambassador to Egypt, delivered a speechwith the purpose of "setting the record straight" on America's relationship with Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood.

      Specifically, Patterson wished to denounce the popular Morsi conspiracy theory that the U.S. concocted Morsi's rise to power.

      Clearly, the speech had little effect. The following photos were taken throughout this past week's protests:


      Since Morsi was overthrown on Wednesday, Obama has noticeably avoided referring to the military removal as a "coup."

      That is because if the events are deemed a coup, it would mean the U.S. can no longer legally provide billions of dollars in aid to Egypt.

      But why is Obama interested in continued 

      to send billions to Egypt?


      So then why does Obama want to keep the door open to provide funding to Egypt, and is the Morsi conspiracy at play?

      Please let me know, one way or another, what you think by commenting below.

      Mass demonstration jitters also have hit what was once the darling of emerging market investor. Check out our take on Brazil.

      PREMIUM CONTENT

      Trump's Radical Overhaul of the U.S. Dollar

      Congress just approved President Trump's latest plans for the dollar...

      And they're so bold that one central bank chair says we haven't seen anything like it in almost a century.

      One Wall Street insider says it's the start of a once-in-a-lifetime investing opportunity, IF you act now.



      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌


    6. Interestingly, the Obama administration used the language of "moderate Islamists" to describe the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and he called Iran's President Rouhani, a "moderate ...
      https://www.jpost.com/opinion/obama-morsis-muslim-brotherhood-and-american-aid-money-563721




      The Middle East Forum’s explosive new report highlights the widespread international network of Islamic Relief’s charities and their close connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. That charity, a s sprawling international network, has not changed even after the Islamic Relief’s cofounder, Hany El-Banna, retired from official representation. Through close connections to Hamas-backed charities in Gaza, dedicated transfer of funds to Hamas-led charities, intimate links to other charities known for financing terrorist causes and organizations, and origins with people like Essam El Haddad, a foreign policy adviser to the now-deposed Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president Mohamed Morsi, Islamic Relief has been deeply enmeshed in promoting Islamist ideology and serving as a seemingly legitimate Western front for Muslim Brotherhood’s agendas.
      Haddad, who, despite seemingly retiring from Islamic Relief’s operations, opened an Islamic Relief branch in Cairo while serving as a government official in Morsi’s administration.  That branch had support of the Muslim Brotherhood leadership, received a large donation from its parent branch in UK, and was used as a cover to fund the Muslim Brotherhood operations in Egypt, while appearing to engaging in legitimate charity activities. 
      In 2013, in his official capacity, the report reveals, Haddad met with Iran’s spy chief, Qassem Soleimani in Cairo “to advise the Government on building its own security and intelligence apparatus, independent of the national intelligence services.”
      At the same time, then-president Barack Obama, whose administration likewise met with Haddad, adopted policies favoring the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, with then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton openly calling for Morsi’s release after he was arrested by Sisi’s government after the coup. For instance, the administration signed a law that made the allocation of aid to Egypt contingent on progress in human rights. However, when Morsi came to power, there was no evidence of such progress – yet aid continued to flow. 
      Interestingly, the Obama administration used the language of “moderate Islamists” to describe the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and he called Iran’s President Rouhani, a “moderate” reformist, despite the rise of human rights violations in Iran on Rouhani’s watch. Muslim Brotherhood, too, on the surface rejected violent jihad, preferring to fund various proxies who either directed these attacks or educated individuals who then went on to carry out acts of terrorism. Reformists in Iran played the same game, and likely learned from one another.

      There are two fascinating issues here. First, Morsi was friendly to Iran, as indicated by his visit to Tehran in 2012 – and illustrating an important policy shift. He was later accused of leaking state secrets to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. In retrospect, given the highlighted meeting between Haddad and Soleimani, that accusation likely had some basis in reality. What is interesting is that prior to coming to power, in Egypt the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran were more likely to be considered ideological competitors rather than friends. Iran, as it now appears, would gladly coopt any group willing to further it ends. As we now know, Iran assisted the September 11 al-Qaeda terrorists, and furthermore gave shelter to al-Qaeda inside Iran as part of a special arrangement, eventually even helping the terrorist organization to rebuild itself.
      The Muslim Brotherhood, on the other hand was better known for sponsoring terrorist proxies and ideological movements that reflected its Islamist ideology. Yet at the core, revolutionary Sunni Islamism, despite different religious precepts from Iran’s Shi’a based Khomeinism, was based in similar political principles and methods. The fraternization between Morsi’s Brotherhood and Khamenei-led Iran should have been less of a surprise than it was. The ties between the Muslim Brotherhood and Shi’ite Khomeinists predate the Islamic Revolution. Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei translated two of Sayyid Qutb’s – one of the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief ideologists and the intellectual father of al-Qaeda – most important work into Persian. Clearly, Muslim Brotherhood’s ideology influenced the very precepts of the Islamic Revolution in Iran; its founders certainly were inspired by the revolutionary zeal and the methods of spreading the message. These works have been spread far and wide throughout Iran, and are perhaps two of the most widely read Islamic tracts. The two Islamist movements are “similar ideologically, though not theologically.” Indeed, the secretary general of Jamaa Islamiya in Lebanon has been known to say: “There are only three schools of thought when it comes to Islamic Awakening: School of Hassan Al-Banna, School of Sayed Qutb and School of Imam Khomeini.”
      Ali Akbar Velayati, adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei said: “The Brotherhood is closest to Tehran among all Islamic groups.”
      Indeed, when then-president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had visited Morsi’s government in Ferbruary 2013, he stated that Egypt is Tehran’s gateway to the region.

      The history of coordination of specific operations between Muslim  Brotherhood and Iran does not begin or end with Egypt. In the 1990s, Iran backed Hassan al Turabi, a Muslim Brotherhood member who helped orchestrate the military coup in Sudan in 1989. Interestingly, Omar Bashir, the seventh president of Sudan, and one of the leaders of the same coup, has been a loyal Saudi ally until recently. The country is part of the Arab Coalition in Yemen, fighting against the Iran-backed Houthi rebellion. At the same time, however, the Bashir regime has cut military defense deals with Qatar and Turkey, both countries funding or allied with the Muslim  Brotherhood. Qatar is also closely aligned with Iran, and hosts Youssef Qaradawi, one of the contemporary spiritual leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood.
      In 2016, when Iranians assaulted the Saudi embassy in Tehran, leading to an open rift between the two countries, the Muslim Brotherhood remained silent. The Brotherhood was also receptive to other overtures by Iran.
      Iran’s meddling in Africa did not stop with Morsi’s outing, although Tehran shifted its onus of activity to Libya and to other Western African countries, growing its relationships with Mauritania, Algeria, and Tunisia after the attack on the Saudi embassy. Egypt for now, is off limits. However, Muslim Brotherhood proxies scattered throughout Africa may still hold the key towards destabilization of allies hostile to Iran’s hegemonic ascent. Furthermore, Iran continues to invest a lot of money in promoting Shi’ism not just in West Africa and the Maghreb, but in Egypt as well.
      Indeed, given the evidence of connection between Islamic Relief figures who were also active in politics and Iran, the political commingling and funding of mutually beneficial causes and groups by the Brotherhood and the Islamic Republic should be investigated and targeted. Both Muslim Brotherhood and Iran support Hamas, but what other terrorist groups and proxies have benefit from the arrangement briefly alluded to by the meeting between Haddad and Soleimani?
      The other issue that has not yet been examined was the timing of the events. While Morsi’s officials, such as Haddad, were negotiating the building of a new and separate intelligence apparatus for Iran, the Obama administration was involved in secret nuclear deal negotiations with the Islamic Republic. A discerning reader may conclude a couple of things from this revelation. First, the Iran regime was not negotiation with the United States and others in good faith. It had belligerent motives, and further, was looking towards fostering a clandestine apparatus separate and apart from its powerful national intelligence mechanism. What is the nature of the services that the Muslim Brotherhood was promising to help develop remains unclear; whether Iran was ever successful in creating yet another agency and what purpose it was supposed to serve likewise needs to be examined. But at that time Iran clearly intended to increase its level of covert and clandestine activities far beyond its contemporaneous capabilities, and likely for reasons hostile to Western interests.
      Whether or not that had anything to do with covering up clandestine nuclear research remains a mystery worth uncovering. Another view of the issue is that Iran was helping the Muslim Brotherhood build a separate intelligence apparatus in Egypt. If that is the case, questions remain. Was Iran looking to utilize this apparatus inside Egypt for its own illicit activities? Did it pursue the same strategy with other countries? Are there perhaps additional informal intelligence apparati in Turkey or other countries aligned with Tehran in some way? Has Iran created a sub rosa extension network modeled after its own clandestine groups across the world?  Second, the issue of the Obama administration’s open support for Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood-led government may not be as much of a contradiction in light of the nuclear deal ambitions as previously thought.
      As we now know, Obama’s red line in Syria was nothing but a ruse to please Tehran and ensure the success of the deal. Given that the Muslim Brotherhood appeared to be an important and growing partner for Iran, which viewed Sissi as significantly less interested in cooperation, perhaps the White House pursued the same line in Egypt, as it did in Syria – protect Iranian interests and the potential for the nuclear deal at all costs. How much did the Obama administration know about Muslim Brotherhood’s joint plans with Iran and when did it know it? How strong are the connections between various Muslim Brotherhood proxies, such as the Islamic Relief, and their Iran-funded counterparts? The Islamic Relief report is the first step to finding out.

      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌





    7. Speaking anonymously, officials said the US was urging Egypt's president to take immediate steps to address opposition grievances, with the offer of billions of dollars in aid if he agreed.
      https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/obama-offers-mohammed-morsi-billions-in-aid-to-halt-egypt-s-slide-into-civil-war-8685295.html 













      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    8. Over the past two days, millions of Egyptians have taken to the streets, most of them calling for early presidential elections with the aim of ousting Mohamed Morsi. June 30 marked Morsi's one-year anniversary as president, and while he was elected democratically in 2012, his actions since have been more in the authoritarian style of a Mubarak than a reformer with the demands of the Egyptian ...


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    9. Oct 15, 2013Following Morsi's overthrow, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates pledged to Egypt a total of $12 billion in loans, outright grants and fuel discounts.

      https://www.upi.com/Top_News/Opinion/de-Borchgrave/2013/10/15/Commentary-Geopolitical-amnesia/68501381836239/ 

      Commentary: Geopolitical amnesia

      By ARNAUD DE BORCHGRAVE, UPI Editor at Large
    10. Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi and Erdogan have made no secret of sponsoring Hamas. They've even encouraged it to launch its rocket war on Israel.
      06:58 PM ET 11/27/2012That Hamas chose to launch its massive barrage against Israel after President Obama's re-election is no coincidence. He's given it every reason to feel it can act with relative impunity.
      The president's unconditional support for two of Hamas' biggest enablers in the region — Turkey and the new Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt — clearly have emboldened the terror group.
      Since taking control of Gaza in 2006, Hamas has regularly shelled Israel. But rocket and mortar attacks against its civilians have increased each year since Obama took office.

      Through Nov. 20 of this year, Hamas fired a total of 1,203 missiles and rockets, up from 156 for all of 2009, according to an unclassified Israel Defense Forces report. Through Oct. 31, meanwhile, mortar attacks more than doubled to 204.
      After Obama was re-elected, the terror group intensified its bombardment of Israel, firing more than 640 rockets through last week's cease-fire.

      For the first time, Hamas rockets pounded Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, not just the region next to Gaza. Not only have attacks steadily increased under Obama, they've hit distant targets inside Israeli cities.

      A smaller escalation occurred last summer after Obama defied Congress and unfroze $147 million in aid to the Palestinians. Some 600,000 Gazans now receive nearly $100 million worth of USAID assistance (even though they voted into power a U.S.-designated terror group).
      So? Israeli intelligence figures that as much as 45% of U.S. and other foreign aid to Gaza and the West Bank is diverted to fund terrorism and buy rockets, mainly from Iran.
      The undeniable truth is, Hamas has escalated its war on Israel as this administration has increased aid and diplomatic ties to Gaza, while snubbing Israel at almost every turn.

      And in a shocking switch from longstanding U.S. policy, it formally embraced Hamas' Egyptian parent, the Muslim Brotherhood.
      Not coincidentally, four longer-range Fajer 5 missiles also hit Israel after Obama won re-election. Shockingly, these were Egyptian missiles launched from the Sinai.
      For the first time in 30 years, Cairo has moved tanks into the desert region in violation of its Israeli peace treaty. Look for the Brotherhood regime to ultimately put the treaty to a national referendum and, once the population rejects it, declare the treaty null and void.
      If this happens, remilitarizing the Sinai will be a footnote. (If you think pump prices are high now, just wait.)
      If you have any doubt Obama's policies have emboldened Israel's enemies, consider this chain of events:
      2007: Hamas takes over Gaza, prompting Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to seal the border with Gaza out of "concern for the possibly destabilizing effects of Hamas' relations with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, which Mubarak considers a threat," according to a congressional report.
      2008: Hamas rains rockets on Israel.
      2009: Obama meets with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan in his first foreign visit, warmly embracing the hard-line Islamist as a "friend" and "partner."
      2009: Obama travels to Egypt and gives a major speech condemning Israeli "occupation" of the West Bank. "The situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable," he says, adding: "The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. It is time for these settlements to stop."
      His remarks are met with thunderous applause from the crowd, which includes Brotherhood leaders invited by Obama over Mubarak's objections. Obama describes Hamas as having "support" among Palestinians. Not once does he describe it as a terrorist organization.
      2009: Obama waives restrictions on Palestinian funding, authorizes $200 million in cash transfers, claiming it's "in the interest of national security."
      2010: Erdogan sponsors Gaza supplies flotilla led by armed Hamas operatives who shoot, stab and club Israeli soldiers when they try to inspect the Turkish ship at the head of the flotilla.
      2010: Obama calls Israel's actions "tragic," fails to condemn Hamas operatives.
      2010: Erdogan threatens future Gaza flotillas accompanied by the Turkish navy.
      2011: Erdogan formally bankrolls Hamas regime with $300 million in aid, making our NATO ally a terror sponsor.
      2011: Obama formalizes ties with Egypt's once-outlawed Brotherhood.
      2011: Egypt permanently opens border crossing with Gaza; formally recognizes Hamas.
      Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi and Erdogan have made no secret of sponsoring Hamas. They've even encouraged it to launch its rocket war on Israel. Nor have they made any secret of their contempt for our ally Israel. In fact, they share Hamas' goal of eliminating the one true democracy in the Mideast.
      It seems the more unabashed they grow in promoting the Brotherhood's jihad against Israel, the closer Obama draws to them. Until he publicly demands they cease sponsoring such terrorism, Jerusalem can be excused for not trusting him.


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    11. Obama addressed the situation in Egypt on Saturday explaining "The United States supported democracy in Egypt. It's been challenging given there has not been a tradition of democracy in Egypt." he said. "Our most immediate concerns have to do with our embassies and consulates."
      Clash DailyJuly 2, 2013
      https://clashdaily.com/2013/07/buddies-obama-gives-billions-to-egypts-bellicose-morsi/ 

      Egyptian opposition group accused the US of “being partner to a conspiracy to keep President Mohamed Morsi in power.”

      Obama addressed the situation in Egypt on Saturday explaining “The United States supported democracy in Egypt. It’s been challenging given there has not been a tradition of democracy in Egypt.” he said. “Our most immediate concerns have to do with our embassies and consulates.”

      In June, the Secretary of State John Kerry quietly gave $1.3 billion in military aid to Egypt. The money was given a month after a memo admitted “we are not satisfied with the extent of Egypt’s progress and are pressing for a more inclusive democratic process and the strengthening of key democratic institutions.”

      The opposition is furious. “America and the Brotherhood have united to bring down the Egyptian people,” said Hassan Shahin, a member of the Tamarod, or “rebel,” movement.

      In 2011, the US had dropped its support of Mubarak, instead supporting a movement toward “democracy.”


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    12. The document discusses the Obama administration's decision to provide $60 million in aid to Syrian rebels and $250 million in aid to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood government. It argues that this funding contradicts warnings about austerity measures in the US and instead prioritizes interests of Islamic groups over American citizens.

      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    13. Al-Ahram columnist Ahmed al-Beri wrote on 23 March that "while the United States has often been supportive of President Mohamed Morsi's regime, Egypt's security and economic deterioration may be forcing it to reevaluate this support."[1] Such thoughts are not exclusively al-Beri's; they are dominating intellectual circles inside Egypt. The emergence of the Muslim Brotherhood as the ...


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    14. In a firmly worded statement, Obama called on the Egyptian military to relinquish power to a democratically elected civilian government and to resist arresting ousted President Mohammed Morsi and his supporters. He also said the U.S. will review whether Egypt is still eligible for $1.5 billion that Washington gives in economic and military aid annually.

      Obama maintains measured approach to Egypt

      WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration maintained a measured approach to the nationwide turbulence in Egypt on Wednesday, even as the military overthrew the Islamist government.

      President Barack Obama has long made it clear that he favors a foreign policy of consultation and negotiation, but not intervention, in the persistent and mostly violent upheavals across the Mideast.

      In a firmly worded statement, Obama called on the Egyptian military to relinquish power to a democratically elected civilian government and to resist arresting ousted President Mohammed Morsi and his supporters. He also said the U.S. will review whether Egypt is still eligible for $1.5 billion that Washington gives in economic and military aid annually.

      Calling himself “deeply concerned” about the turmoil, Obama nonetheless maintained “that, ultimately the future of Egypt can only be determined by the Egyptian people.”

      “The longstanding partnership between the United States and Egypt is based on shared interests and values, and we will continue to work with the Egyptian people to ensure that Egypt’s transition to democracy succeeds,” Obama said.

      It was a muted response compared to the uproar that has for days gripped Egyptians, many of whom in turn have openly jeered the U.S. for appearing too close to Morsi, despite his hard-line Islamist policies. The White House has gamely struggled since Morsi’s election more than a year ago to embrace his presidency, despite fears that his Muslim Brotherhood power base would revert to its anti-American and anti-Israel roots instead of taking a more moderate stance towards peace.

      It should come as little surprise that Obama, who is grappling with a recovering economy, a war-weary public at home and diminished U.S. status as a global superpower abroad, would not wade into foreign conflicts.

      Obama campaigned by promising to end the war in Iraq, which he did in 2011; he now plans to withdraw most, if not all, U.S. troops from Afghanistan by the end of next year and inevitably will face pitched pleas from Kabul to reconsider as the deadline nears.

      U.S. polls indicate that two-thirds of Americans have opposed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      In Egypt, American officials had given Morsi strong suggestions — tied to billions of dollars in aid — to ease tensions but went unheeded. Officials in Washington and Cairo said Wednesday there are no plans for U.S. military intervention in Egypt, although a unit of about 500 Marines remain on standby in the nearby Red Sea, where it has been stationed for some time.

      The White House also has long resisted deploying troops to Syria. Additionally, and despite criticism from some in Congress and allies abroad, Obama refused until last month to give weapons to Syrian rebels who have been battling for more than two years to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad.

      Tamara Cofman Wittes, who served as deputy assistant secretary of state from late 2009 until early this year, said the administration’s strategy in the Mideast may be a not-so-subtle reminder that the U.S. is no longer willing — or able — to play either world policeman or peacekeeper.

      But, in the case of Egypt, Wittes said the White House may no longer have enough sway to advise a political transition, even if it wanted to do so.

      The U.S. should be urging the new Egyptian government to stabilize its roiled economy quickly and prevent the country from plunging even deeper into political instability, Wittes said, adding, “There’s a role for the United States to be weighing in.”

      However, “for better or worse, we’re in a position now where the United States has to some extent alienated the political opposition, and by not standing with Morsi, I suppose they’ve also alienated the Muslim Brotherhood,” Wittes said Wednesday. “So I don’t think the U.S. finds itself with a lot of ready audiences.”

      ___

      Associated Press writers Lara Jakes and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

      ___

      Follow Lara Jakes on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/larajakesAP


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

    15. No wonder Obama is asking the Egyptian Army to release MorsiObama has asked for the release mohamed-morsi • SECRET agreement between the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood (not the Egyptian government) to give 40% of the Sinai and the annexation of that part of Egyptian territory in Gaza.

    16. Secret $8 billion deal between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood

      SHOCKER: Secret $8 billion deal between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood
      Below is a summary of the video in Arabic that reveals an agreement made between Barack Obama and Mohamed Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood, to give 40% of Sinai to Hamas in exchange for $8 billion has already been paid to Morsi by Obama. 

      No wonder Obama is asking the Egyptian Army to release Morsi: Obama has asked for the release mohamed-morsi




      • SECRET agreement between the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood (not the Egyptian government) to give 40% of the Sinai and the annexation of that part of Egyptian territory in Gaza. The objective is to facilitate the conclusion of a comprehensive peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians 

      • This agreement was signed by Khairat el Shater (number 2 of the Brotherhood) by Morsi and the Supreme Guide of the Mulsim Brotherhood.

      • A sum of U.S. $ 8 billion was paid in exchange for the land. 

      • An investigation is ongoing Morsi and El Shater. An arrest warrant was filed against the Guide to MB and other members of his office. 

      • MB signatories to the agreement are liable to the death penalty for treason. 

      • The Obama administration would try to reach an agreement with El Sissi (Defense Minister): recognition of the legitimacy of the “coup” in exchange for his silence about the secret agreement. But El Sissi would be more interested in the conviction of MB and discredit their organization which is Egypt’s main source of danger. 

      • The Republican members of Congress are seriously looking into the case. If proven, the process of Obama impeachment could be triggered.







      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌



      The Inquisitr

      https://www.inquisitr.com › obama-gives-f-16s-to-egypt-after-morsi-calls-jews-apes-and-pigs

      Commentary | Two weeks ago, a video made in 2010 surfaced in which the current President of Egypt referred to Jews as "" Descendants Of Apes And Pigs" and " Bloodsuckers ." On the same tape, he called President Obama a liar, and made a variety of anti-American comments. Instead of putting Morsi on notice that his behavior is a complete and unforgivable violation of every standard of ...


      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
    17. US Taxpayers to give $3.1 Billion to Egyptian Dictator, Mohammed Morsi by Conservative Action Alerts on December 3, 2012 "To assume this kind of power is

      US Taxpayers to give $3.1 Billion to Egyptian Dictator, Mohammed Morsi





      US Taxpayers to give $3.1 Billion to Egyptian Dictator, Mohammed Morsi


      by Conservative Action Alerts on December 3, 2012

      “To assume this kind of power is unacceptable to the United States of America” – Sen. John McCain on Egyptian President Morsi’s dictatorial power grab.

      ALERT: Taxpayers to pay over $3.1 Billion in order to fund pro-Islam Egyptian Dictator, Mohammed Morsi. Fax Congress to Cut Egyptian Foreign Aid.
      Dear Conservative,

      Over the past two weeks we have seen the failure of U.S. Foreign Aid. Consider Egypt.

      Egypt, one of the largest recipients of U.S. Aid in the Middle East is in full-blown chaos… despite the annual billions the federal government generously provides them.

      The country’s recently elected President, the Muslim Brotherhood’s own Mohammed Morsi, just granted himself full dictatorial power, such that some have called him a modern “Pharaoh.” He has suspended the courts, the parliament, and has himself become the rule of law.

      In an address on Thursday Morsi said, of course, that his full suspension of government is only transitory, calling it “a temporary procedure, for a limited period.” Although this has yet to be seen, we know history tells us that power assumed by dictatorial fiat is not easily or quickly returned to its rightful place.

      In the event that Morsi does relieve himself of the role of supreme power and Egypt adopts his up-and-coming constitution, little improvement will have been made. The fact is: Morsi’s new Sharia-based constitution endangers Egypt’s Christian and non-Muslims populations; fails to recognize women’s rights; permits slavery; and is opposed to complying with international law.

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and sign and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and its dictator Mohammed Morsi. 

      Yes, the new Egyptian constitution, currently in draft form, strengthens the power of Sharia law, a very undemocratic system of governance that is opposed to individual liberty, what America was founded on. 

      One report says:

      “[T]he new draft says that the principles of Islamic law will be the basis of law. Previously, the term “principles” allowed wide leeway in interpreting Shariah. But in the draft, a separate new article is added that seeks to define “principles” by pointing to particular theological doctrines and their rules. That could give Islamists the tool for insisting on stricter implementation of rulings of Shariah.” 
      We must ask this question: How have U.S. Dollars helped spread democracy to Egypt, when it is evident that the nation has only seen turmoil over the past two years and has only birthed a more radical, anti-liberty Islamic governmental system?

      It’s time for the United States Government to end Foreign Aid to Egypt, and reject the century-old failed Wilsonian practice of “spreading democracy around the globe.”

      While our bridges and highways are falling apart; while our national borders are left insecure; while American war veterans are returning home to programs that are out of money; and while the United States’ budget remains in an abysmal state, American Foreign Aid remains untouched without even a penny’s worth of alteration.

      Isn’t it time for a change? We must demand our elected servants in Congress to end foreign aid to the Egyptian government, a pro-Islamic system of anti-liberty.

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and re-evaluate all other U.S. Foreign Aid commitments. Tell Congress that the United States has no business taking taxpayer dollars, borrowed dollars, or printed dollars to “subsidize” other people’s governments! 

      Just two months ago, America – and the entire world – watched the Obama Administration completely fail our embassies in both Egypt and Libya. In the latter case, four lives were lost as a result of the Obama administration’s negligence.

      The Obama “Benghazi Cover-up,” which Conservative Action Alertsreported on as it was happening, is just one more reason to cut U.S. Aid and re-evaluate our expenditures in that area altogether.

      It stands as fact that the Obama Administration cannot be trustedwith the American people’s money – the Administration’s disinformation campaign and egregious flip-flopping in regards to the overt acts of terror in Benghazi, Libya has proven it.

      Barack Obama blatantly lied on national television about Benghazi in the U.S. Foreign Policy debate with then-candidate Romney – he lied when he said he had immediately called the Benghazi event “terror” when, in fact, neither he or his administration had. 

      Susan Rice, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, took days to admit it and the rest of the Obama Administration even longer. Senator Lindsay Graham was correct in his assessment of Rice when he said she is “so disconnected with reality” that he doesn’t trust her.

      Yet, We the Taxpayers are paying for the Obama Administration’s expensive, reckless, and in many ways pro-Islam Foreign Policy — our dollars are subsidizing his Administration’s dangerous, un-American behavior.

      And we never agreed to it.

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and Libya and re-evaluate all other U.S. Foreign Aid commitments. Tell Congress that the United States has no business taking taxpayer dollars, borrowed dollars, or printed dollars to “subsidize” other people’s governments! 

      Right now, it is high time to force our elected servants to re-think our expensive foreign aid commitments – this is an extremely important issue, and a moral one.

      Is it right for the American people to be anything other than outraged at the fact that we are subsidizing corruption to the tune of billions of dollars per annum? Is it right for us to recognize the irresponsible, careless behavior of the Obama Administration and then give our consent? Absolutely not.

      Knowing that we are deep in debt is should be a signal enough for our Government to cut foreign “benevolence” – and by that we mean money to Egypt, Libya, and all non-allies. But, as we have seen, at no single point since the 9/11/12 attacks or Mohammed Morsi’s tyrannical power-grab has anyone in the Obama Administration – or even in Congress, save a few – mentioned reducing foreign aid.

      That the General Government provides road and bridge-building “stimulus plans” to hostile foreign countries is unconscionable. Let’s not forget that the government produces nothing, it only takes – and the “taking” is from our pockets, and the pockets of our fellow Americans.

      These are the great and terrible facts of our Federal Government today. But there is hope. We, the American People, can exercise our God-given sovereignty and demand our government to change their ways and start representing us!

      Now is the time for us to press for less foreign aid, not more; it’s time we demand our government to cease being the “noble lender” that endlessly funds the world! Let us call on our elected servants to re-evaluate Foreign Aid!

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and Libya and re-evaluate all other U.S. Foreign Aid commitments. Tell Congress that the United States has no business taking taxpayer dollars, borrowed dollars, or printed dollars to “subsidize” other people’s governments! 

      In September, just after the Benghazi terror attacks, the New York Times reported that the U.S. Government planned on organizing an “emergency” fund of $450 million dollars to Egypt to help spread democracy. The fact that the United States Government would do such a thing right after the Benghazi attack is the height of absurdity.

      The foreign stimulus initiative was led by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who claimed at that time that that the world needs to support the governments that were born out of the Arab Spring in Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt. In other words, Clinton believes that the United States should dump money on other governments in hopes that we can buy their friendship and establish democracy.

      Thankfully, some of our Congresspersons were not on board with Clinton and the idea that we should pump “emergency” money into a nation that has shown itself hostile towards our own.

      Consider Texas Republican Rep. Kay Granger’s statementcondemning Clinton’s plan:
      “This proposal comes to Congress at a point when the U.S. – Egypt relationship has never been under more scrutiny, and rightly so. I am not convinced of the urgent need for this assistance and I cannot support it at this time. As Chair of the Subcommittee, I have placed a hold on these funds.” 

      Now is the time for us to press for less foreign aid, not more – it’s time our government ceases to be the “noble lender” that endlessly funds the world! It’s time to call for a re-evaluation of Foreign Aid!

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and Libya and re-evaluate all other U.S. Foreign Aid commitments. Tell Congress that the United States has no business taking taxpayer dollars, borrowed dollars, or printed dollars to “subsidize” other people’s governments! 

      The Fiscal Facts: Billions of Dollars to Hostility 

      If we do not act and demand our elected servants to cut Foreign Aid spending, Libya and Egypt alone will have received $3,117,850,000.00 U.S. Dollars by this year’s end!
      Specifically, Libya – where our Ambassador was photographed as he was dragged dead through the streets – will receive a total of $4,100,000.00 in U.S. Aid by this year’s end, according to official Foreign Assistance numbers

      See below:




      And Egypt is set to receive the enormous total of $3,113,750,000.00this year. 

      See below:



      The United States has no business spending such an exorbitant amount of money on these nations – we are deeply in debt and simply cannot afford it. Not only that, their system of governance is in opposition to our own, especially in Egypt with “Pharaoh” Mohammed Morsi!

      Senator Rand Paul has been a champion in calling the U.S. Government to reevaluate its reckless spending overseas. Though his bill S. 3576 failed, he remains committed to continue to his push to curb U.S. Aid:

      “When nearly 80 percent of Americans believe foreign aid should be reduced – especially to countries that are not our allies – it is inconceivable why their views are ignored by so many in Congress. I am far from defeated on this; I will continue to fight for this issue when Congress returns, and I will continue to call attention to the billions of American dollars – borrowed from China, among other places – being sent to governments that are not willing to respect and protect our interests overseas.” 

      Now is not the time to give up on our efforts to cut Foreign Aid expenditures – it is time to push harder than ever.

      Will you help us and demand the United States Government to stop sending billions of taxpayer dollars to hostile nations!? 

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and Libya and re-evaluate all other U.S. Foreign Aid commitments. Tell Congress that the United States has no business taking taxpayer dollars, borrowed dollars, or printed dollars to “subsidize” other people’s governments! 

      It would do us good to remember history and recall how the great 20th century conservative Garet Garrett once criticized our government’s foolish Foreign Aid expenditures; he wrote in 1952, “The winds that blow our billions away return burdened with themes of scorn and dispraise.” If America was unable to “buy” permanent friends and establish democracy on foreign soil after the First and Second World Wars – when we were in our economic heyday – how much less can we do this today?

      There is no buying friendship. And if other nations should choose to hate us, let them do it for free. 

      The fact is: the Obama Administration has no business taxing, printing, or borrowing money just to give it away to nations that would otherwise be called enemies. They also have no business funding pro-Islam dictators associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and Libya, and re-evaluate all other U.S. Foreign Aid commitments. 



      For America,
      Conservative Action Alerts

      www.ConservativeActionAlerts.com

      Take Action with Conservative Action Alerts and send your Faxes to Congress demanding we end U.S. Foreign Aid to Egypt and Libya and re-evaluate all other U.S. Foreign Aid commitments. Tell Congress that the United States has no business taking taxpayer dollars, borrowed dollars, or printed dollars to “subsidize” other people’s governments! 

      Please share this effort on social network like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.; forward it to your friends; and, print it to share publicly.

      *Also, please send your petition to your U.S. Representative and Senators on this effort.
      Conservative Action Alerts (CAA) is a media outlet protected by the first amendment and that support for our efforts is not tax-deductible. Diener Consultants, Inc., 10940 S Parker Rd Ste# 763, PARKER, CO 80134-7440

      Tagged as:  dictator,  egypt,  Foreign Aid,  funding dicatatorsmaking the world safe for democracy,  mohammed morsispreading democracy,  us foreign aid

      US Taxpayers to give $3.1 Billion to Egyptian Dictator, Mohammed Morsi
      Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)



      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌



      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌



      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

      ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌